Accessibility relation

Accessibility relations are motivated conceptually by the fact that natural language modal statements depend on some, but not all alternative scenarios. For instance, the sentence "It might be raining" is not generally judged true simply because one can imagine a scenario where it was raining. Rather, its truth depends on whether such a scenario is ruled out by available information. This fact can be formalized in modal logic by choosing an accessibility relation such that ${\displaystyle wRv}$ iff ${\displaystyle v}$ is compatible with the information that's available to the speaker in ${\displaystyle w}$.

This idea can be extended to different applications of modal logic. In epistemology, one can use an epistemic notion of accessibility where ${\displaystyle wRv}$ for an individual ${\displaystyle I}$ iff ${\displaystyle I}$ does not know something which would rule out the hypothesis that ${\displaystyle w^{\prime }=v}$. In deontic modal logic, one can say that ${\displaystyle wRv}$ iff ${\displaystyle v}$ is a morally ideal world given the moral standards of ${\displaystyle w}$. In application of modal logic to computer science, the so-called possible worlds can be understood as representing possible states and the accessibility relation can be understood as a program. Then ${\displaystyle wRv}$ iff running the program can transition the computer from state ${\displaystyle w}$ to state ${\displaystyle v}$.

Different applications of modal logic can suggest different restrictions on admissible accessibility relations, which can in turn lead to different validities. The mathematical study of how validities are tied to conditions on accessibility relations is known as modal correspondence theory.