Lably
Skip to content

Annuity

Series of payments made at equal intervals

  • 11 min read
  • 7 chapters
  • 2 labs on Lably

Learn it on Lably

Typical examples include regular deposits to a savings account, monthly home mortgage payments, monthly insurance premiums and pension payments. The value of an annuity is usually expressed as a present value or future value, calculated by discounting or accumulating the payments at a specified interest rate.

Annuities can be classified by the timing of payments, for example annuity-immediate and annuity-due, by whether the term is fixed or contingent on survival, and by whether the amounts are fixed, variable or linked to an index. Contracts may start paying immediately or after a deferral period, and a contract that continues indefinitely is a perpetuity.

History

In medieval and early modern Europe, annuities developed through rents, rentes, and other rights to income. A buyer or creditor could provide capital in return for a recurring payment secured by land, municipal revenue, or another income source. These arrangements included perpetual rents, life rents, term annuities, and municipal annuities used to finance wars, public works, or debt consolidation. Because the transaction could be framed as the sale of an income right, it provided a form of credit in legal and religious settings where direct interest-bearing loans were restricted.

By the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, annuities had become important instruments of public finance. Governments and municipalities in the Dutch Republic, France, and England sold fixed-term, perpetual, and life-contingent annuities to raise money. Life annuities created a valuation problem because the issuer had to allow for both interest and uncertain survival. Crude pricing could make the contracts costly for issuers if buyers with long expected lifetimes obtained terms that did not reflect age or mortality.

The mathematical treatment of life-contingent payments developed from this practical problem. John Graunt's work on the Bills of Mortality helped show that deaths could be studied statistically at the population level. In 1671, Johan de Witt prepared a report on life annuities for the Dutch government that used discounted expected-value reasoning to compare life annuities with redeemable annuities. Later work by Edmond Halley used data from Breslau to construct a life table and to calculate life-annuity values. Together, these works applied mortality observations and compound-interest calculations to payments contingent on survival.

Tontine schemes developed alongside ordinary life annuities. In a tontine, payments to surviving participants could increase as other participants died, while a life annuity normally promised a stated income while the annuitant survived. Governments used tontines as public-borrowing instruments, but their payment structure exposed participants to a different form of longevity pooling from ordinary life annuities. Recent proposals have revived tontine-like arrangements as retirement-income designs that pool longevity risk without promising each participant a fixed lifetime payment.

During the eighteenth century, annuity mathematics expanded to joint lives, survivor benefits, and reversions. Reversionary annuities, which typically paid a widow or dependent after another person's death, were used in widows' funds, clergy funds, and other mutual or occupational arrangements. Their pricing depended on mortality assumptions, selection, contribution levels, and the terms on which participants entered the scheme.

By the nineteenth century, annuity business had largely moved from private and public obligations to incorporated life insurance institutions that priced contracts using observed mortality experience. Actuarial practice changed annuity business because long-duration promises required mortality tables, interest assumptions, reserves, and solvency methods. Life insurance and life annuities became connected within the same institutions, since life insurance protects against early death while a life annuity protects against unusually long survival.

In the twentieth century, pensions and public retirement systems made annuity-like income more common even where individuals did not buy retail annuities directly. Defined benefit pensions and public pension schemes often provide lifetime income, while joint-and-survivor pension options use multiple-life annuity principles. In the United States, private annuity markets remained small until the 1930s, when demand for insurance-company products grew during the Great Depression and group annuity contracts for corporate pension plans developed.

Variable annuities later grew as contracts that combined investment-linked features with the tax deferral available to life insurance products. Late twentieth- and early twenty-first-century annuity markets added fixed deferred annuities, indexed annuities, income riders, pension risk transfer, and longevity-risk transfer markets. Research on the annuity puzzle has linked low voluntary annuitisation to factors such as existing pension income, bequest motives, liquidity preference, product complexity, pricing, and behavioural framing.

Sign in to keep reading

6 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Politics and economics