Lably
Skip to content

Anti-Mormonism

Hostility towards the Latter Day Saint movement

  • 21 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Prejudice

Opposition to Mormonism began before the first Latter Day Saint church was established in 1830 and continues to the present day. The most vocal and strident opposition occurred during the 19th century, particularly the forced expulsion from Missouri following the 1838 Mormon War, during the Utah War of the 1850s, and in the second half of the century when the practice of polygamy in Utah Territory was widely condemned by the majority of Americans. Opponents of polygamy believed that polygamy forced wives into submission to their husbands and some described polygamy as a form of slavery.

Modern-day opposition generally takes the form of websites, podcasts, videos or other media primarily criticizing the LDS Church, or protests at its large gatherings, such as its semiannual general conference, outside of Latter-day Saint pageants, or at events surrounding the construction of new temples. Scholars hold that the church's historical claims are false, while some non-Latter-day Saint Christians teach that the faith is non-Christian. Critics claim that it is a religion based on fraud or deceit on the part of its past and present leaders.

Most Americans accept Mormonism as a valid faith, and in 2012, the US presidential candidate Mitt Romney's membership in the LDS Church was described as "non-issue" in that year's election. Despite this, the percentage of Americans who stated that they would be less likely to vote for a Mormon president had increased from 25% in 2008 (Romney's first candidacy) to 34% in 2012.

The FBI began tracking anti-Mormon hate crimes in the United States in 2015 and have noted an increase in incidents over time (through 2019).

Origin

The term, "anti-Mormon" first appears in the historical record in 1833 by the Louisville (Kentucky) Daily Herald in an article, "The Mormons and the Anti-Mormons" (the article was also the first known to label believers in the Book of Mormon as "Mormons"). In 1841, it was revealed that an Anti-Mormon Almanac would be published.

Dozens of publications had strongly criticized Mormonism since its inception. In 1834, Eber D. Howe published his book Mormonism Unvailed. The Latter Day Saints initially labeled such publications "anti-Christian", but the publication of the Almanac and the subsequent formation of an "Anti-Mormon Party" in Illinois heralded a shift in terminology. "Anti-Mormon" became a common self-designation for those opposed to the religion.

Today, the term is primarily used as a descriptor for persons and publications active in their opposition to the LDS Church, although its precise scope has been the subject of some debate. Some use it to describe all thought perceived as critical of the LDS Church. Siding with the latter, less-inclusive understanding of the term, Latter-day Saint scholar William O. Nelson suggests in the Encyclopedia of Mormonism that the term includes "any hostile or polemic opposition to Mormonism or to the Latter-day Saints, such as maligning Joseph Smith, his successors, or the doctrines or practices of the Church. Though sometimes well-intended, anti-Mormon publications have often taken the form of invective, falsehood, demeaning caricature, prejudice, or legal harassment, leading to both verbal and physical assault."

Reaction

Many of those who have been labeled "anti-Mormon" object to the designation, arguing that the term implies that disagreement or criticism of Mormonism stems from some inherent "anti-Mormon" prejudice, rather than being part of a legitimate factual or religious debate.

Even some members of the LDS Church who write negatively about it have had their writings labeled anti-Mormon. Ex-members who write about the LDS Church are likewise frequently labeled anti-Mormon, even when their writings are not inflammatory in nature. The debate on who is "anti-Mormon" frequently arises in Mormon discussions of authors and sources.

Stephen Cannon has argued that use of the label is a "campaign by Latter-day Saints to disavow the facts presented by simply labeling the source as 'anti-Mormon'". Critics of the term also claim that Mormon authors promote the ideal of a promised heavenly reward for enduring persecution for one's beliefs.

Those individuals and groups who challenge Mormonism, particularly those who approach the challenge from an evangelical Christian perspective, would generally sustain that they do, in fact, have the best interests of the Mormon at heart.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Social studies