Lably
Skip to content

Arab conquest of Egypt

639–646 Rashidun Caliphate campaign

  • 27 min read
  • 5 chapters
Arab conquest of Egypt
Mohammad Adil ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0

Related on Lably

Through Constantinople and Muhammad

Prior to the conquest, Byzantine rule in Egypt had undergone significant political and military disruption. The province had been conquered and occupied by the Sasanian Empire for roughly a decade between 618 and 629, before being reconquered by the Byzantines under Emperor Heraclius. These events occurred within the wider context of prolonged conflict between the Byzantine and Sasanian empires that reshaped imperial authority across the eastern Mediterranean in the early seventh century.

By the mid-630s, the Byzantine Empire had also lost control of Syria and its Ghassanid federate allies in Arabia following a series of defeats by the Rashidun Caliphate. The subsequent loss of Egypt—one of the empire’s most economically and strategically important provinces—and the defeat of Byzantine forces further reduced imperial military and fiscal capacity, contributing to additional territorial contraction in the eastern Mediterranean in the centuries that followed.

Background

In 640, Heraclius was the Byzantine emperor, Cyrus of Alexandria was both the government-appointed Chalcedonian Patriarch of Alexandria and de facto governor of Egypt, and Theodore was the commander-in-chief of the Byzantine army in the province. The majority of the Egyptians were non-Chalcedonian Oriental Christians, and instead recognised Pope Benjamin I as their rightful Pope and Patriarch of Alexandria.

Since the time of the Byzantine Emperor Justinian I, Egypt was administratively divided into four provinces under the control of the general ruler of the East in Constantinople. These provinces were Aigyptiaca (Alexandria and the western Delta), Augustamnica (the eastern Delta until Arish in northern Sinai), Arcadia (Middle Egypt to Oxyrhynchus) and Thebaid (Upper Egypt starting at Hermopolis). Each of these provinces was headed by a Pagarch (prefect). This division resulted in divided accountability for Egypt, which contributed to its defeat to both the Sasanian invasion (618–621 AD) and the Arab invasion (641 AD).

Following the death of Muhammad in 632 AD, the Arab armies of the Rashidun Caliphate began expanding toward both Sasanian Persia and the Byzantine Empire. Neither of the two former powers was prepared for the aggressive expansion of the Arabs, as both largely underestimated them. This is best depicted by the ambivalent views held by the Byzantines and the painstakingly slow reaction of the Sasanians.

After defeating the Byzantines at Yarmuk (636 AD) and the Persians at al-Qadisiyyah (637 AD), the gaze of the Arab generals turned towards the riches of Byzantine Africa. After the Siege of Jerusalem, it was Amr ibn al-As who suggested an invasion of Egypt to the Caliph Umar, being familiar with the country's prosperity both from visiting it as a merchant and from leading the expedition to Gaza in 637. Appealing to the Caliph, he said "the conquest of Egypt will give great power to the Muslims and will be a great aid to them, for it is the wealthiest land and the weakest in fighting and war power."

After being convinced by Amr to proceed with the invasion, Umar is said to have had "an eleventh-hour change of heart", but too late to stop it. This element of the story, which conveys the caliph's wariness at allowing a general to seize such an asset, may have been a later embellishment in light of Amr's subsequent reputation as a stubbornly independent governor.

For three years after the Muslim conquest of Syria, Cyrus had been paying them tribute not to invade Egypt.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Post-classical