Lably
Skip to content

Archaeology of China

  • 4 min read
  • 4 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Archaeology and Interdisciplinarity

The application of modern scientific archaeology to Chinese sites began in 1921, when Johan Gunnar Andersson first excavated the Yangshao Village sites in Henan. Andersson believed that prehistoric Chinese culture had a "Western Origin". In fact, most archaeologists at that time believed that all human civilizations, including Chinese, originated in the broader Middle East and then spread to different regions of the world. This statement caused an uproar in China. Chinese archaeologists hope to find evidence to refute this argument, which has led to a series of Chinese-led archaeological projects.

Excavations from 1928 at Anyang, also in northern Henan, by the newly formed Academia Sinica by anthropologist Li Ji uncovered a literate civilization identified with the late stages of the Shang dynasty of early Chinese records. Earlier cities in northern Henan were discovered at Zhengzhou in 1952 and Erlitou in 1959. More recently prehistoric cities such as Panlongcheng and Sanxingdui have been discovered in other parts of China.

History

Beginning in the Song dynasty (960-1279), many members of the Chinese gentry began to pursue antiquarian hobbies such as art collection, leading to scholar-officials retrieving several ancient relics from archaeological sites, such as ancient ceremonial vessels that were then used in state rituals. Scholar-officials claimed to have discovered ancient bronze vessels that were created and used during the Shang dynasty (1600-1046 BCE) due to the fact that they contained Shang era characters. Although romanticism abounded around these artifacts (including imaginative recreations by scholar-officials that were not based on proper evidence), the fanciful nature of the antiquarian pursuit was heavily criticized by Shen Kuo in his Dream Pool Essays. Shen objected to the notion that the vessels were created by famous sages or ancient aristocrats, correctly observing that the artifacts were more likely made by ancient artisans or commoners from previous eras. Shen also believed that the antiquarian pursuit of archaeology simply to enhance state ritual was frivolous, as he was far more in favor of an interdisciplinary approach to the study of archaeology and emphasized the study of functionality and process of manufacture for artifacts.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Archaeology