Lably
Skip to content

B61 nuclear bomb

US Nuclear bomb

  • 17 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Cold War and Free fall

The B61 is of the variable yield ("dial-a-yield" in informal military jargon) design with a yield of 0.3 to 340 kilotons in its various mods ("modifications"). It is a Full Fuzing Option (FUFO) weapon, meaning it is equipped with several fuzing options including air burst, ground burst, free-fall, retarded free-fall (parachuted) and laydown delivery. It has a streamlined casing allowing its release by supersonic aircraft. It is 11 ft 8 in (3.56 m) long, with a diameter of about 13 inches (33 cm); the basic weight of the B61 is about 700 pounds (320 kg), with weight differences for parachute delivery. As of 2020, the weapon was undergoing a 12th modification. In 2012, the roughly 400 B61-12s were estimated to each cost "more than its weight in gold" – $28 million apiece.

As of 2026, approximately 505 B61s are in service. The strategic B61-11 nuclear bunker buster is believed to be the only nuclear weapon assigned to the B-2 Spirit stealth strategic bomber, which can carry up to sixteen. The B61-12 is the only remaining US tactical nuclear weapon, with 200 stockpiled, approximately 100 in the US, and another 100 in certain European NATO member states under its nuclear sharing arrangement, maintained by munitions squadrons. The B61-12 is certified for delivery by the F-35A Lightning II stealth fifth generation fighter, and F-15E Strike Eagle, F-16 Fighting Falcon, and Panavia Tornado IDS fourth generation fighters. Alongside the United States Air Force, the air forces of Belgium, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Turkey, and the United Kingdom are believed to host B61-12 bombs, and operate a mixture of the certified aircraft to deliver them. The B61-13 is being developed as a strategic bunker buster for the forthcoming US B-21 Raider strategic bomber.

B61 variants have been previously deployed on many U.S. aircraft. Such as the B-52 Stratofortress and B-1 Lancer strategic bombers; F-117 Nighthawk and F-111 Aardvark ground-based attack aircraft, and F/A-18 Hornet and A-7 Corsair II carrier-based attack aircraft.

Development

In 1961, a report was issued indicating Navy and Air Force interest in a lightweight bomb to replace existing weapons, but that both services had considerably different military requirements for such a weapon. However, the authors of the report believed that due to advances in technology it was possible for a single weapon to fulfill both requirements. This was followed by a report from Sandia in mid-1962, that believed that a lightweight nuclear bomb with full fuzing option was possible and that such a program could be completed in a short time-span, possibly by 1965 or 1966.

Development of the weapon that would become the B61 was authorized in December 1962. The justification for the program was that the new weapon would modernize the nuclear arsenal, improve the capability of aircraft and simplify the nuclear weapons inventory by replacing lower-yield versions of the B28 and B43 nuclear bombs. The desired production date was June 1965.

The weapon was designated the TX-61 in January 1963. Due to the short time-scales, it was decided to make maximum use of off-the-shelf components such as those developed for the B57 nuclear bomb. Environmental conditions specified included an indefinite temperature range of −60 to 160 °F (−51 to 71 °C), shocks of up to 40 g (390 m/s2), and in flight temperatures of up to 275 °F (135 °C) for up to 40 minutes. Parachute deployment was specified to produce a maximum load of 255 g (2,500 m/s2).

The weapon was designed and built by the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico. Production engineering began in 1965, with the first war-reserve B61-0 weapon accepted by the AEC in December 1966. However production was halted in May 1967 for design modifications to be made before resuming in January 1968. Shot Flintlock Halfbeak in June 1966 may have been a full yield test of the weapon with other tests conducted between 1963 and 1968 at the Nevada Test Site.

During testing, spin motors were added to the weapon to produce a spin of 5 revolutions per second. This was to improve stability and decoupling during high speed delivery. Three alternatives to the weapon were also explored for still-classified reasons. The first alternative was halted due to its similarity to the original TX-61 design, and the Department of Defense was unfavorable to the second option which halted its exploration. The TX-61 design was ordered to "proceed along the lines" of the third alternative in May 1964, though it is unclear what that means.

Total production of all versions was approximately 3,155, of which approximately 540 remain in active service, 415 in inactive service and 520 are awaiting dismantlement as of 2012.

Fourteen versions of the B61 have been designed, known as Mod 0 through Mod 13 (see table below). Each shares the same physics package, with different yield options. One variant is the Mod 11, deployed in 1997, which is a ground-penetrating bunker busting weapon. The Russian Continuity of Government facility at Kosvinsky Kamen, finished in early 1996, was designed to resist US earth-penetrating warheads and serves a similar role as the American Cheyenne Mountain Complex. The timing of the Kosvinsky completion date is regarded as one explanation for US interest in a new nuclear bunker buster and the declaration of the deployment of the Mod 11 in 1997: Kosvinsky is protected by about 1,000 feet (300 m) of granite.

The B61 unguided bomb should not be confused with the MGM-1 Matador cruise missile, which was originally developed under the bomber designation B61.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Military technology