Lably
Skip to content

Booi Aha

Hereditarily servile people in 17th-century Qing China

  • 4 min read
  • 3 chapters

Explore on Lably

ToursExplore Lably’s 3D tours

They were largely divided into three categories translated into English:

  • company servants (Chinese: 佐領下人; Chinese: zuǒlǐng xiàrén)
  • half-company servants (Chinese: 管領下人; Chinese: guǎnlǐng xiàrén)
  • estate bannermen (Chinese: 莊頭旗人; Chinese: zhuāngtóu qírén)

Concept

According to Mark C. Elliott, the word "booi" could be confusing due to the absence of a proper Chinese word having the same meaning. The Manchu phrase literally means "of the household", but calling booi aha "slaves" conveys the wrong meaning. The reason is that there is no corresponding social status in Chinese society for booi, who often served in powerful positions and were sometimes intimates of the emperor.

As a compromise in Chinese they were called "bao-yi", but this caused further misunderstanding. In Manchu documents, booi only sometimes means "bond servant", and despite the common belief it can simply refer to "people to my house" in some occasions.

Pamela Kyle Crossley wrote in her book Orphan Warriors: "The Mongol is the slave of his sovereign. He is never free. His sovereign is his benefactor; [the Mongol] does not serve him for money." This Mongolian "traditional model of slave to owner" was taken up by the Manchu during the development of the Eight Banner military system.

Crossley gave as the definition of Manchu: "A Manchu was, moreover, a man who used his skills exclusively to serve the sovereign....banners as institutions were derived from Turkic and Mongolian forms of military servitude, all enrolled under the banners considered themselves slaves of the emperor and called themselves so (aha, Chinese: 奴才; pinyin: nucai) when addressing him...".

Sign in to keep reading

2 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Sociology