Lably
Skip to content

Close-packing of equal spheres

Dense arrangement of congruent spheres in an infinite, regular arrangement

  • 8 min read
  • 4 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Geometry, Sphere and Crystal

Many crystal structures are based on a close-packing of a single kind of atom, or a close-packing of large ions with smaller ions filling the spaces between them. The cubic and hexagonal arrangements are very close to one another in energy, and it may be difficult to predict which form will be preferred from first principles.

FCC and HCP lattices

There are two simple regular lattices that achieve this highest average density. They are called face-centered cubic (FCC) (also called cubic close packed (CCP) and hexagonal close-packed (HCP), based on their symmetry. Both are based upon sheets of spheres arranged at the vertices of a triangular tiling; they differ in how the sheets are stacked upon one another. The FCC lattice is also known to mathematicians as that generated by the A3 root system.

Cannonball problem

The problem of close-packing of spheres was first mathematically analyzed by Thomas Harriot around 1587, after a question on piling cannonballs on ships was posed to him by Sir Walter Raleigh on their expedition to America. Cannonballs were usually piled in a rectangular or triangular wooden frame, forming a three-sided or four-sided pyramid. Both arrangements produce a face-centered cubic lattice – with different orientation to the ground. Hexagonal close-packing would result in a six-sided pyramid with a hexagonal base.

The cannonball problem asks which flat square arrangements of cannonballs can be stacked into a square pyramid. Édouard Lucas formulated the problem as the Diophantine equation

∑n=1Nn2=M2

or, equivalently,

16N(N+1)(2N+1)=2N3+3N2+N6=M2

and conjectured that the only solutions are N=1,M=1, and N=24,M=70. Here N is the number of layers in the pyramidal stacking arrangement and M is the number of cannonballs along an edge in the flat square arrangement.

Positioning and spacing

In both the FCC and HCP arrangements each sphere has twelve neighbors. For spheres of radius 1, there are

  • Six large octahedral interstitial gaps surrounded by six other spheres, where the distance from the centers of the gap to the centers of the surrounding spheres is √{2}
  • Eight small tetrahedral interstitial gaps surrounded by four other spheres, where the distance from the centers of the gap to the centers of the surrounding spheres is √3⁄2

For every N spheres, there are N octahedral gaps and 2N tetrahedral gaps.

Relative to a reference layer with positioning A, two more positionings B and C are possible. Every sequence of A, B, and C without immediate repetition of the same one is possible and gives an equally dense packing for spheres of a given radius.

The most regular ones are

  • FCC = ABC ABC ABC... (every third layer is the same)
  • HCP = AB AB AB AB... (every other layer is the same).

There is an uncountably infinite number of disordered arrangements of planes (e.g. ABCACBABABAC...) that are sometimes collectively referred to as "Barlow packings", after crystallographer William Barlow.

In close-packing, the center-to-center spacing of spheres in the xy plane is a simple honeycomb-like tessellation with a pitch (distance between sphere centers) of one sphere diameter. The distance between sphere centers, projected on the z (vertical) axis, is:

pitchZ=6⋅d3≈0.81649658d,

where d is the diameter of a sphere; this follows from the tetrahedral arrangement of close-packed spheres.

The coordination number of HCP and FCC is 12 and their atomic packing factors (APFs) are equal to the number mentioned above, 0.74.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Topics in mathematics