Lably
Skip to content

Compensated emancipation

Form of abolishing slavery in which former slaveowners were paid

  • 4 min read
  • 2 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Slavery, Market value and Compromise

A number of countries (see "Other nations and empires" section below) enacted forms of compensated emancipation. In the United States, however, no nationwide compensation system was ever put in place. Only the District of Columbia, which was under federal control, used compensated emancipation as part of ending slavery in 1862.

Opposition

Owners complained that their compensation was small compared with their loss; they were paid less, often much less, than the market value the slaveowner could have sold the enslaved person for. Governments and non-slaveholding citizens complained about the financial burden of compensating the owners, while for the formerly enslaved it seemed ludicrous that those who had all along benefited from slavery should now receive additional compensation, while its victims received no compensation whatsoever.

Historian Eric Foner wrote, "Even Haiti, where slavery died amid a violent revolution, agreed in 1824 to pay a large indemnity to former slaveholders in exchange for French recognition of its independence.... No one proposed to compensate slaves for their years of unrequited toil." Compensation of slaveholders has been viewed as akin to compensating a thief for returning stolen property, or paying ransom to a kidnapper for releasing his victim, and therefore not so much compensation as a reward for committing what should be a crime.

Sign in to keep reading

One more chapter is free with a Lably account.

More in Sociology