Lably
Skip to content

Conditioned avoidance response test

Test of antipsychotic-like activity

  • 8 min read
  • 6 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Drug, Operant conditioning and Motivation

Dopamine D2 receptor antagonists, like most classical antipsychotics, are active in the CAR test once occupancy of the dopamine D2 receptor reaches around 70%. Dopamine D2 receptor partial agonists like aripiprazole are likewise active in the test. Serotonin 5-HT2A receptor antagonists can enhance suppression of conditioned avoidance responses in the test. Various other types of drugs have also been found to be active in the CAR test. The effects of drugs that are active in the test are thought to be mediated by inhibition of signaling in the nucleus accumbens or ventral striatum of the mesolimbic pathway. This is a major brain area involved in behavioral activation and motivation.

The CAR test was developed in the 1950s soon after the discovery of antipsychotics. It is one of the oldest animal tests of antipsychotic-like activity. Other animal tests that are used to evaluate antipsychotic-like activity include inhibition of drug-induced hyperactivity or stereotypy, reversal of drug-induced prepulse inhibition deficits, and restoration of latent inhibition.

Description

There are several variations of the CAR test. The most common form of the test is the two-way active avoidance test (also known as the two-way discriminated shuttle box procedure). Other variations of the test include the one-way active avoidance test (also known as the one-way discriminated pole jump procedure or the pole-jumping test) and the non-discriminated operant continuous avoidance procedure (also known as the continuous avoidance test, the Sidman avoidance test, or simply the Sidman procedure).

In the two-way active avoidance test, an animal is placed in a two-compartment shuttle box with an open doorway. Then, the animal is trained to avoid an aversive stimulus (unconditioned stimulus), usually an electric footshock, on presentation of a neutral stimulus (conditioned stimulus), usually an auditory or visual stimulus like a tone or light, that shortly precedes it. The animal does this by performing a specific behavioral response, like moving to the other compartment of the box, and this response is referred to as "avoidance" or "conditioned avoidance". If the animal is late in performing the avoidance, the aversive stimulus is presented until the animal responds by moving to the compartment. This is referred to as "escape". If the animal does not escape within a certain amount of time, it is designated "escape failure". As such, there are three variables that can be measured in the CAR test: avoidance, escape, and escape failure.

Drugs that are considered to show antipsychotic-like effects selectively suppress the avoidance response without affecting escape behavior. Conversely, drugs that are not considered to have antipsychotic-like effects either have no effect in the CAR test or suppress both avoidance behavior and escape behavior at the same doses. Examples of drugs that inhibit both avoidance and escape responses include sedatives like benzodiazepines, barbiturates, and meprobamate and antidepressants like many tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs).

The CAR test is considered to have high predictive validity in the identification of potential antipsychotics and is frequently used in drug development. However, its face validity and construct validity have been described as low or absent. Moreover, a described major limitation of the model is that drugs active in the test work by impairing a normal self-preservation function; that is, avoiding an unpleasant or painful stimulus.

Another limitation of the CAR test is that selective suppression of avoidance responses by drugs is procedure-specific. In procedures besides the one-way discriminated pole jump procedure and the two-way active avoidance test, such as the Sidman procedure, antipsychotics block avoidance behavior and escapes at almost the same doses. Conversely, benzodiazepines selectively suppress avoidance behavior without affecting escape behavior in the Sidman procedure. This is opposite to what is generally described as reflecting antipsychotic-like activity. Hence, selective suppression of avoidance responses is not a specific predictor of antipsychotic efficacy, or at best, selective suppression of avoidance responses as a predictor of antipsychotic activity is dependent on the specific CAR procedure employed.

Sign in to keep reading

5 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Neuroscience