Eukaryogenesis

Last eukaryotic common ancestor

Organelles

The last eukaryotic common ancestor (LECA) is the hypothetical most recent common ancestor of all living eukaryotes, around 2 billion years ago, and was most likely a biological population. It is believed, on the basis of study of the genomes of different lineages of modern eukaryotes, to have been a single cell with a nucleus, at least one centriole and cilium, facultatively aerobic mitochondria, sex (meiosis and syngamy), a dormant cyst with a cell wall of chitin and/or cellulose, and peroxisomes.

It has been proposed that the LECA fed by phagocytosis, engulfing other organisms. The LECA has been described as having "spectacular cellular complexity". Its cell was divided into compartments such as the Golgi apparatus, the endoplasmic reticulum, and the nuclear envelope. It appears to have inherited a set of endosomal sorting complex proteins that enable membranes to be remodelled, including pinching off vesicles to form endosomes.

Genetic mechanisms

In eukaryotes, unlike in prokaryotes, the mechanisms for transcribing DNA into RNA, and then for translating the RNA into proteins, were separated, permitting extensive RNA processing and allowing the expression of genes to become more complex. It had mechanisms for reshuffling its genetic material, and possibly for manipulating its own evolvability. All of these gave the LECA "a compelling cohort of selective advantages".

Eukaryotic sex

Sex in eukaryotes is a composite process, consisting of meiosis and fertilisation, which can be coupled to reproduction. Dacks and Roger proposed on the basis of a phylogenetic analysis that facultative sex was likely present in the LECA. Early in eukaryotic evolution, about 2 billion years ago, organisms needed a solution to the major problem that oxidative metabolism releases reactive oxygen species that damage the genetic material, DNA. Eukaryotic sex provides a process, homologous recombination during meiosis, for using informational redundancy to repair such DNA damage.

Symbiogenesis

According to the theory of symbiogenesis (the endosymbiotic theory) championed by Lynn Margulis, the eukaryotic cell originated from an archaeal cell that gained a bacterial cell as a component or symbiont. The archaeal cell was a member of the Asgard kingdom (more recently identified as one of the Heimdallarchaeia within Promethearchaeota). The bacterium was one of the alphaproteobacteria, which had the ability to use oxygen in its respiration. This enabled it – and the archaeal cells that included it – to survive in the presence of oxygen, which was poisonous to other organisms adapted to reducing conditions. The endosymbiotic bacteria became the eukaryotic cell's mitochondria, providing most of the energy of the cell. Endosymbiosis is broadly accepted in the origin of eukaryotes, though the scenarios involved continue to be debated.

Scenarios

Competing sequences of mitochondria, membranes, and nucleus

Biologists have proposed multiple scenarios for the creation of the eukaryotes. While there is broad agreement that the LECA must have had a nucleus, mitochondria, and internal membranes, the order in which these were acquired has been disputed. In the syntrophic model, the first eukaryotic common ancestor (FECA, around 2.2 gya) gained mitochondria, then membranes, then a nucleus. In the phagotrophic model, it gained a nucleus, then membranes, then mitochondria. In a more complex model, it gained all three in short order, then other capabilities. Other models have been proposed. Whatever happened, many lineages must have been created, but the LECA either out-competed or came together with the other lineages to form a single point of origin for the eukaryotes.

Nick Lane and William Martin have argued that mitochondria came first, on the grounds that energy had been the limiting factor on the size of the prokaryotic cell. Enrique M. Muro et al. have argued, however, that the genetic system needed to reach a critical point that led to a new regulatory system (with introns and the spliceosome), which enabled coordination between genetic networks. The phagotrophic model presupposes the ability to engulf food, enabling the cell to engulf the aerobic bacterium that became the mitochondrion.

Eugene Koonin and others, noting that the archaea share many features with eukaryotes, argue that rudimentary eukaryotic traits such as membrane-lined compartments were acquired before endosymbiosis added mitochondria to the early eukaryotic cell, while the cell wall was lost. In the same way, mitochondrial acquisition must not be regarded as the end of the process, for still new complex families of genes had to be developed after or during the endosymbiotic exchange. In this way, from FECA to LECA, the organisms can be considered as proto-eukaryotes. At the end of the process, LECA was already a complex organism with protein families involved in cellular compartmentalization.

Nico Bremer and others confirmed that the LECA had mitochondria, and stated that it had multiple nuclei, but disputed that it was phagotrophic. This would mean that the ability found in many eukaryotes to engulf materials developed later, rather than being acquired first and used to engulf the alphaproteobacteria that became mitochondria.

Viral eukaryogenesis

Another scenario is viral eukaryogenesis, which proposes that the eukaryotes arose as an emergent superorganism, with the nucleus deriving from a "viral factory" alongside the alphaproteobacterium mitochondrion, hosted by an archaeal cell. In this scenario, eukaryogenesis began when a virus colonised an archaeal cell, making it support the production of viruses. The virus may later have assisted the bacterium's entry into the reprogrammed cell. Eukaryotes share genes for several DNA synthesis and transcription enzymes with DNA viruses (Nucleocytoviricota). Those viruses may thus be older than the LECA and may have exchanged DNA with proto-eukaryotes.

Associations of microbes

Biologists have long speculated that eukaryogenesis might have involved associations with other microbes. In 2026, Moisès Bernabeu and colleagues stated in Nature on the basis of phylogenomics, across the full range of cellular organisms and viruses, that LECA had derived its proteins from multiple types of bacteria. They suggest that this occurred in repeated horizontal gene transfers, and that some of these most likely took place before the endosymbiosis that created mitochondria. The lead researcher, Toni Gabaldón, commented that the explanation of the origin of eukaryotes as a symbiosis of an archaeon with a bacterium is incomplete, as other bacteria and giant viruses had been involved. The bacteria included Planctomycetota and later the Myxococcota, while the giant viruses belonged to the Nucleocytoviricota. The viruses appear to have served to transfer genes between different microbes and hence to construct the genome of the LECA.

Diversification: crown eukaryotes

In turn, the LECA gave rise to the eukaryotes' crown group, containing the ancestors of animals, fungi, plants, and a diverse range of single-celled organisms with the new capabilities and complexity of the eukaryotic cell. Single cells without cell walls are fragile and have a low probability of being fossilised. If fossils do form, they have few features to distinguish them clearly from prokaryotes: size, morphological complexity, and (eventually) multicellularity. Early eukaryote fossils, from the late Paleoproterozoic, include Tappania from 1.63 gya and Shuiyousphaeridium from 1.8 gya, both microscopic acritarchs with ornate and relatively robust carbonaceous vesicles, but no resolved assignment to any specific group of modern eukaryotes. As such, they are occasionally considered possible stem group eukaryotes, prior to LECA. The earliest fossils confidently assigned to known crown eukaryotes appear at around 1.00 gya, such as the putative algae Bangiomorpha and Proterocladus, the fungus Ourasphaira and the holozoan Bicellum.

The LECA's position (i.e. the root) on the eukaryotic tree of life remains controversial. Stechmann and Cavalier-Smith 2003 suggested that the first split after the LECA happened between the Unikonta and the Bikonta, while Adl et al. 2012, and Derelle and Lang 2012 proposed a split between Amorphea and all other eukaryotes. Al Jewari and Baldauf 2023 argued instead that the first split happened within Excavata, while Cerón-Romero et al. 2024 favoured a first split between the Opisthokonta and all the others. Derelle et al 2015 place the first split as between the Opimoda and the Diphoda (corresponding roughly to the former Unikonta and Bikonta), while Williamson et al 2025 suggest possible extensions to the two new clades.