Lably
Skip to content

European Structural and Investment Funds

European Union financial tools

  • 15 min read
  • 7 chapters

Related on Lably

Through European Union

Overview

Five ESIFs currently exist:

ESIFs constitute the majority of total EU spending; nearly half of all ESIF allocations are realised as expenditure in the "real economy" through third party purchases, and are among the largest items of the budget of the European Union. Apart from them, there are also other EU funds that contribute to regional development, in particular the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF), the Just Transition Fund, the Connecting Europe Facility, the LIFE programme, the InvestEU Programme, Horizon Europe and Erasmus+.

It is up to the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to define the tasks, priorities and organisation of the Structural Funds (the Regional Policy framework), through the ordinary legislative procedure and consulting the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (leading to the publication of Regulations).

The key indicator for the division of regions into objectives is the Gross National Product per capita (GNP p.c.). This criterion is criticised on the ground that it does not reflect the socio-economic reality of regions. Some groups (e.g. Beyond GDP) propose the creation of a set of different indicators.

Fund management

The way the ESIFs are spent is based on a system of shared responsibility between the European Commission and the member state authorities:

  • The Commission negotiates and approves each member states's National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) and operational programmes (OPs), and uses these as a basis for allocating resources.
  • The member states and their regions manage the programmes. This includes implementing the OPs by selecting individual projects, controlling and assessing them.
  • The commission is involved in overall programme monitoring, pays out approved expenditure and verifies the national control systems.

Prior to 1989, funding decisions were taken by the European Commission. This was followed by a period where EU member states tried to maximize control, with little systematic project appraisal and a focus on a small number of large projects. Since 1994 more systematic, co-ordinated and complex methods of allocating resources have been introduced. For example, most funds within the 2004–06 Integrated Regional Operational Programme (IROP), and its 2007–13 successor (ROP), are allocated through largely need-based project-selection mechanisms. Regions with low GDP receive more funds. However, within these regions, more funds go to relatively rich local areas with the best institutions. It has been argued that part of this can be explained by the frequent need to co-fund projects, and the needed capacity to prepare applications.

Sign in to keep reading

6 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Economics