Lably
Skip to content

Football economics

Aspect of sports economics

  • 8 min read
  • 3 chapters

Explore on Lably

ToursExplore Lably’s 3D tours

FIFA, football's world governing body, generates substantial revenue, primarily from selling TV broadcast rights for tournaments like the World Cup. In the 2015-18 cycle, FIFA earned $6.4 billion, with $4.6 billion from TV rights, and for 2019–2022, revenue reached a record high of US$7.57 billion, with broadcasting rights accounting for US$3.426 billion. Other significant revenue streams include marketing rights (US$1.66 billion in 2015–18, US$1.795 billion in 2019–22), ticket sales and hospitality (US$712 million in 2015–18, US$949 million in 2019–22), and licensing rights (US$180 million in 2021, US$769 million in 2019–22). FIFA also covers considerable costs, such as prize money ($440 million total for Qatar 2022) and expenses for World Cup host countries. Hosting the World Cup involves massive expenditures for the host nation; Qatar's preparation for the 2022 tournament, including infrastructure like stadiums, was estimated to cost as much as $220 billion, significantly more than Russia spent in 2018.

More recently, Saudi Arabia has become a major financial force in global football as part of its Vision 2030 plan for economic diversification, with the Public Investment Fund (PIF) acquiring stakes in clubs like Newcastle United and four major Saudi Pro League teams. This has led to significant spending on high-profile international players and a substantial increase in the Saudi Pro League's revenue and global profile, although it has also attracted criticism, including allegations of "sports washing".

History

Academic interest in the economics of professional team sports dates back as far as the mid-1950s. Much of the academic literature originated in the United States, dominated by studies of sports such as baseball, basketball, and (American) football. These early writings shed light on issues like determinants of player compensation, joint production in team sports, competitive balance, and the contribution of managers to team performance. Professional sports, due to the availability of data, offer opportunities for empirical economists to investigate economic propositions that may be difficult to test in other areas.

Simon Rottenberg is widely credited with writing the first academic analysis of the economics of professional team sports. His paper, ‘The Baseball Players’ Labor Market’, published in the Journal of Political Economy in 1956, analyzed the economic implications of the reserve clause in US professional baseball. Rottenberg argued that free agency in the player labor market would not necessarily lead to the concentration of the best players in the richest teams, contrary to the defense of the reserve clause at the time. He suggested that the distribution of playing talent is determined by the incentive to maximize the capitalised value of players' services, a result he argued would be yielded by a free market.

Other significant early contributions include the work of Walter Neale (1964), who distinguished between sporting and economic competition and suggested that sports leagues exhibit characteristics of a natural monopoly, and Peter Sloane (1971), who questioned whether the league or the individual club is the relevant economic decision-making unit in European football and proposed that clubs may be utility maximizers rather than solely profit maximizers.

Sign in to keep reading

2 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Economics