Lably
Skip to content

History of Hangul

History of the Korean alphabet

  • 28 min read
  • 12 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Alphabet, Literacy and Gregorian calendar

Before Hangul's creation, Korea had been using Hanja (Chinese characters) since antiquity. As Hanja was poorly suited for representing the Korean language, and because its difficulty contributed to high illiteracy, Joseon king Sejong the Great (r. 1418–1450) moved to create Hangul. The script was announced around late 1443 to early 1444 and officially published in 1446 via the text Hunminjeongeum and its companion commentary Hunminjeongeum Haerye. While Hangul saw gradual adoption among both the elite and commoners, it was looked down upon by the elite for centuries. It was only widely adopted in the late 19th century. It is now the predominant script for Korean in both Koreas and among the Korean diaspora. It is also used to write the Jeju language, and to a limited degree, the Cia-Cia language of Indonesia.

Background

Some time in antiquity, Korea adopted writing in the form of Hanja (Chinese characters). There is a legend that, before that, during the Old Chosŏn period and around the time of the legendary ruler Tan'gun, Koreans used another original script dubbed "Sinji". Ahn is skeptical of the claim and argues there is no strong evidence to support its existence.

The difficulty of Hanja limited the script's use to mostly upper-class people; commoners were largely illiterate. Hanja is not well suited for representing the Korean language; the Chinese and Korean languages are not closely related and differ in significant ways. For example, Classical Chinese uses subject–verb–object word order while Middle Korean uses subject–object–verb word order. Korean pronunciation and ideas could only be indirectly represented. Some efforts were made to adapt the script to suit Korean, which resulted in the Idu script and its varieties, including Hyangch'al. Scholars have evaluated these scripts as complicated and difficult to decipher, and thus not useful for promoting widespread literacy. Classical Chinese was used for official documents and most works of literature, while Idu script was used for clerical documents and transactions.

Creation

Due to a lack of records, it is unknown when work on Hangul first began, nor what that process looked like. Sejong possibly developed the script in secret, although this is debated. Most scholars believe Sejong was significantly personally involved in the script's creation. A minority believe that he was the sole creator of it.

Hangul was first introduced, likely in a mostly complete form, to Sejong's court in the 12th month of 1443 of the Korean calendar (around December 30, 1443 to January 28, 1444, in the Gregorian calendar). Some time afterwards, Sejong had the office Ŏnmunch'ŏng (lit. 'Vernacular Script Commission') established. The office worked on applying Hangul and developing official documentation for it. In the 9th month of 1446, Hangul was officially promulgated via the introductory texts Hunminjeongeum and Hunminjeongeum Haerye. The Hunminjeongeum begins with this now famous preface by Sejong:

The sounds of our country's language are different from those of the Middle Kingdom and are not confluent with the sounds of characters. Therefore, among the ignorant people, there have been many who, having something they want to put into words, have in the end been unable to express their feelings. I have been distressed because of this, and have newly designed twenty-eight letters, which I wish to have everyone practice at their ease and make convenient for their daily use.

— Sejong the Great, Hunminjeongeum, preface

Critics of the script emerged soon after its introduction. They argued a native Korean script was too far a departure from Chinese civilization, which they insisted Korea should be deferent to in a Confucian manner. Modern historians have argued that elitism and self-interest were other motivators for the faction; literacy in Hanja was then seen as a status symbol and general literacy was seen as potentially harming the social positions of the elite. Jeong Chang-son (정창손; 鄭昌孫), one of such critics, criticized the creation of Hangul as 'pointless' in response to Sejong's plan to use Hangul to better educate people. He claimed that people’s immoral nature could not be reformed by providing them with books translated into Hangul. Jeong was subsequently dismissed from office for making this claim.

Hangul was also referred to as ŏnmun (언문; 諺文; 'vernacular script') in contrast to Classical Chinese, which was referred to as chinmun (진문; 眞文; 'true script') or chinsŏ (진서; 眞書; 'true writing'). As such, although people generally knew how to write Hangul, it was excluded from the realm of official communication that was still dominated by Classical Chinese.

Sign in to keep reading

11 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Language and linguistics