Hitchin–Thorpe inequality
- 2 min read
- 3 chapters
Related on Lably
Through Necessity and sufficiency
Statement of the Hitchin–Thorpe inequality
Let M be a closed, oriented, four-dimensional smooth manifold. If there exists a Riemannian metric on M which is an Einstein metric, then
where χ(M) is the Euler characteristic of M and τ(M) is the signature of M.
This inequality was first stated by John Thorpe in a footnote to a 1969 paper focusing on manifolds of higher dimension. Nigel Hitchin then rediscovered the inequality, and gave a complete characterization of the equality case in 1974; he found that if (M, g) is an Einstein manifold for which equality in the Hitchin-Thorpe inequality is obtained, then the Ricci curvature of g is zero; if the sectional curvature is not identically equal to zero, then (M, g) is a Calabi–Yau manifold whose universal cover is a K3 surface.
Already in 1961, Marcel Berger showed that the Euler characteristic is always non-negative.
Sign in to keep reading
2 more chapters are free with a Lably account.
Proof
Let (M, g) be a four-dimensional smooth Riemannian manifold which is Einstein. Given any point p of M, there exists a gp-orthonormal basis e1, e2, e3, e4 of the tangent space TpM such that the curvature operator Rmp, which is a symmetric linear map of ∧2TpM into itself, has matrix
relative to the basis e1 ∧ e2, e1 ∧ e3, e1 ∧ e4, e3 ∧ e4, e4 ∧ e2, e2 ∧ e3. One has that μ1 + μ2 + μ3 is zero and that λ1 + λ2 + λ3 is one-fourth of the scalar curvature of g at p. Furthermore, under the conditions λ1 ≤ λ2 ≤ λ3 and μ1 ≤ μ2 ≤ μ3, each of these six functions is uniquely determined and defines a continuous real-valued function on M.
According to Chern-Weil theory, if M is oriented then the Euler characteristic and signature of M can be computed by
Equipped with these tools, the Hitchin-Thorpe inequality amounts to the elementary observation
Failure of the converse
A natural question to ask is whether the Hitchin–Thorpe inequality provides a sufficient condition for the existence of Einstein metrics. In 1995, Claude LeBrun and Andrea Sambusetti independently showed that the answer is no: there exist infinitely many non-homeomorphic compact, smooth, oriented 4-manifolds M that carry no Einstein metrics but nevertheless satisfy
LeBrun's examples are actually simply connected, and the relevant obstruction depends on the smooth structure of the manifold. By contrast, Sambusetti's obstruction only applies to 4-manifolds with infinite fundamental group, but the volume-entropy estimate he uses to prove non-existence only depends on the homotopy type of the manifold.

