Lably
Skip to content

Iaba, Banitu and Atalia

  • 13 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Kingdom of Judah

The names of the queens have aroused some interest since out of the three names, only Banitu appears to be an Akkadian (the language of ancient Assyria) name. Various etymological origins have been proposed for the other names; Iaba has variously been identified as a Levantine, Aramean, Arabic or Hebrew name, and Atalia has also variously been identified as Hebrew or Arabic. Since Iaba's funerary inscription includes a curse against anyone who disturbs her tomb, it is possible that she and Atalia were related (as such perhaps circumventing the curse).

The bones discovered in the Nimrud tombs have been the subject of paleopathological research since the 1990s, which has made it possible to gain some insight into the lives and health of the ancient queens. Iaba suffered from several health issues, including chronic sinusitis and perhaps neoplastic meningitis. Out of all the queens found in the tombs at Nimrud, Atalia had by far the most health issues. Atalia's bones suggest that the queen suffered from mild arthritis and the early stages of Scheuermann's disease. Her most painful condition was inflammations within her skull, a recurring and incurable affliction which caused immense head pain.

Names and backgrounds

The three names of the queens are unusually short and modest compared to the names of some of the other known Assyrian queens, such as Shammuramat and Libbali-sharrat. Iaba's name is inscribed in cuneiform as fia-ba-a, transliterated as Iabâ or Yabâ. The name, clearly not of Akkadian origin, might be of either West Semitic, perhaps Levantine or Aramean, or Arabic origin, with possible roots including yph ("beautiful"), nby ("to name") and yhb ("to give").

Banitu's name is inscribed in cuneiform as fba-ni-ti, transliterated as Banītu, Banîtu, Banêti, Banīti or Banitu. Just like Iaba, Banitu might also mean "beautiful" (banītu in Akkadian), but it might also be derived from the Akkadian bānītu, which means "(divine) Creatress". Simo Parpola believes the name Banitu to be of Babylonian origin, and as a consequence speculates that Queen Banitu might have been a Babylonian princess, brought to Assyria as a hostage after Tiglath-Pileser's conquest of Babylon in 729 BC.

Atalia's name is inscribed in cuneiform as fa-ta-li-a or fa-tal-ia-a, depending on the inscription, transliterated as Atalia, Ataliā, Ataliya or Ataliyā. The name is clearly not of Akkadian origin. In 1998, Stephanie Dalley proposed that both Iaba and Atalia were actually names of Hebrew origin and speculated that they were both princesses of the Kingdom of Judah, from the same royal family. Dalley based her argument on the name Atalia being similar, and perhaps etymologically identical, to the name Athaliah (borne by a Judean queen who ruled about a century earlier), that the ending of the name (i-a or ia-a) could represent a theophoric element deriving from Yahweh, and that Atalia and Iaba might have been related. Dalley also argued that the inter-marriage of the Assyrian and Judean royal families could help explain why Sargon II's successor Sennacherib (r. 705–681 BC), who warred against Hezekiah of Judah, in his inscriptions refer to Hezekiah as "strong and mighty", highly unusual epithets for the Assyrians to bestow upon an enemy.

Dalley's arguments have met with both support and opposition and the idea that the names were Hebrew has also been independently forwarded by Simo Parpola. In 2002, K. Lawson Younger pointed out that it was far from certain that i-a or ia-a actually corresponded to Yahweh since there are few analogues in other Neo-Assyrian names and inscriptions. The identification of Atalia as a Hebrew name was also doubted by Nicholas Postgate in 2008, and in that year Ran Zadok alternatively suggested that Atalia was an Arabic name.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Politicians and leaders