Issai Schur

Education

In October 1894, Schur attended the University of Berlin, with concentration in mathematics and physics. In 1901, he graduated summa cum laude under Frobenius and Lazarus Immanuel Fuchs with his dissertation On a class of matrices that can be assigned to a given matrix, which contains a general theory of the representation of linear groups. According to Vogt, he began to use the name Issai at this time. Schur thought that his chance of success in the Russian Empire was rather poor, and because he spoke German perfectly, he remained in Berlin. He graduated in 1903 and was a lecturer at the University of Berlin. Schur held a position as professor at the Berlin University for the ten years from 1903 to 1913.

In 1913, he accepted an appointment as associate professor and successor of Felix Hausdorff at the University of Bonn. In the following years Frobenius tried various ways to get Schur back to Berlin. Among other things, Schur's name was mentioned in a letter dated 27 June 1913 from Frobenius to Robert Gnehm (the School Board President of the ETH) as a possible successor to Carl Friedrich Geiser. Frobenius complained that they had never followed his advice before and then said: "That is why I can't even recommend Prof. J. Schur (now in Bonn) to you. He's too good for Zurich, and should be my successor in Berlin". Hermann Weyl got the job in Zurich. The efforts of Frobenius were finally successful in 1916, when Schur succeeded Johannes Knoblauch as adjunct professor. Frobenius died a year later, on 3 August 1917. Schur and Carathéodory were both named as the frontrunners for his successor. But they chose Constantin Carathéodory in the end. In 1919, Schur finally received a personal professorship, and in 1921, he took over the chair of the retired Friedrich Hermann Schottky. In 1922, he was also added to the Prussian Academy of Sciences.

During the time of Nazism

After the takeover by the Nazis and the elimination of the parliamentary opposition, the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service on 7 April 1933, prescribed the release of all distinguished public servants that held unpopular political opinions or who were "Jewish" in origin; a subsequent regulation extended this to professors and therefore also to Schur. Schur was suspended and excluded from the university system. His colleague Erhard Schmidt fought for his reinstatement, and since Schur had been a Prussian official before the First World War, he was allowed to participate in certain special lectures on teaching in the winter semester of 1933/1934 again. Schur withdrew his application for leave from the Science Minister and passed up the offer of a visiting professorship at the University of Wisconsin–Madison for the academic year 1933–34. One element that likely played a role in the rejection of the offer was that Schur no longer felt he could cope with the requirements that would have come with a new beginning in an English-speaking environment.

Already in 1932, Schur's daughter Hilde had married the doctor Chaim Abelin in Bern. As a result, Issai Schur visited his daughter in Bern several times. In Zurich he met often with George Pólya, with whom he was on friendly terms since before the First World War.

On such a trip to Switzerland in the summer of 1935, a letter reached Schur from Ludwig Bieberbach signed on behalf of the Rector's, stating that Schur should urgently seek him out in the University of Berlin. They needed to discuss an important matter with him. It involved Schur's dismissal on 30 September 1935.

Schur remained a member of the Prussian Academy of Sciences after his release as a professor, but a little later he lost this last remnant of his official position. Due to an intervention from Bieberbach in the spring of 1938 he was forced to explain his resignation from the commission of the Academy. His membership in the Advisory Board of Mathematische Zeitschrift was ended in early 1939.

Emigration

Schur found himself lonely after the flight of many of his students and the expulsion of renowned scientists from his previous place of work. Only Dr. Helmut Grunsky had been friendly to him, as Schur reported in the late thirties to his expatriate student Max Menachem Schiffer. The Gestapo was everywhere. Since Schur had announced to his wife his intentions to commit suicide in case of a summons to the Gestapo, in the summer of 1938 his wife took his letters, and with them a summons from the Gestapo, sent Issai Schur to a relaxing stay in a home outside of Berlin and went with medical certificate allowing her to meet the Gestapo in place of her husband. There they flatly asked why they were still staying in Germany. But there were economic obstacles to the planned emigration: emigrating Germans had a pre-departure Reich Flight Tax to pay, which was a quarter of their assets. Now Schur's wife had inherited a mortgage on a house in Lithuania, which because of the Lithuanian foreign exchange determination could not be repaid. On the other hand, Schur was forbidden to default or leave the mortgage to the German Reich. Thus the Schurs lacked cash and cash equivalents. Finally, the missing sum of money was somehow supplied, and to this day it does not seem to be clear who were the donors.

Schur was able to leave Germany in early 1939. His health, however, was already severely compromised. He traveled in the company of a nurse to his daughter in Bern, where his wife also followed a few days later. There they remained for several weeks and then emigrated to Palestine. Two years later, on his 66th birthday, on 10 January 1941, he died in Tel Aviv of a heart attack.

Work

Schur continued the work of his teacher Frobenius in group theory and representation theory. He also published results across several areas of classical algebra and number theory. His collected works include research on integral equations and infinite series.

Linear groups

In his doctoral thesis Über eine Klasse von Matrizen, die sich einer gegebenen Matrix zuordnen lassen Issai Schur determined the polynomial representations of the general linear group ${\displaystyle GL(n,\mathbb{C})}$ on the field ${\displaystyle \mathbb{C}}$ of complex numbers. The results and methods of this work are still relevant today. In his book, J.A. Green determined the polynomial representations of ${\displaystyle GL(n,\mathbb{K})}$ over infinite fields ${\displaystyle \mathbb{K}}$ with arbitrary characteristic. It is mainly based on Schur's dissertation. Green writes, "This remarkable work (of Schur) contained many very original ideas, developed with superb algebraic skill. Schur showed that these (polynomial) representations are completely reducible, that each irreducible one is "homogeneous" of some degree ${\displaystyle r\ge 0}$, and that the equivalence types of irreducible polynomial representations of ${\displaystyle G{L}_n(\mathbb{C})}$, of fixed homogeneous degree ${\displaystyle r}$, are in one-one correspondence with the partitions ${\displaystyle \lambda =({\lambda }_1,\dots ,{\lambda }_n)}$ of ${\displaystyle r}$ into not more than ${\displaystyle n}$ parts. Moreover Schur showed that the character of an irreducible representation of type ${\displaystyle \lambda }$ is given by a certain symmetric function ${\displaystyle {\underset{\_}{S}}_{\lambda }}$ in ${\displaystyle n}$ variables (since described as a "Schur function")." According to Green, the methods of Schur's dissertation today are important for the theory of algebraic groups.

In 1927, Schur, in his work On the rational representations of the general linear group, gave new proofs of the main results of his dissertation. If ${\displaystyle V}$ is the natural ${\displaystyle n}$-dimensional ${\displaystyle \mathbb{C}}$ vector space on which ${\displaystyle GL(n,\mathbb{C})}$ operates, and if ${\displaystyle r}$ is a natural number, then the ${\displaystyle r}$-fold tensor product ${\displaystyle V^{\otimes r}}$ over ${\displaystyle \mathbb{C}}$ is a ${\displaystyle GL(n,\mathbb{C})}$-module. The symmetric group ${\displaystyle S_r}$ also acts on ${\displaystyle V^{\otimes r}}$ by permuting its tensor factors. By exploiting these ${\displaystyle S_r-GL(n,\mathbb{C})}$-bimodule actions, Schur obtained new proofs of his earlier results.

Professorship in Berlin

In Berlin, Schur was a professor at the University of Berlin for 16 years. Until 1933, his research group worked in areas including representation theory, solvable groups, combinatorics, and matrix theory, with several of these topics developed further by his students. Schur made significant contributions to algebra and group theory;Hermann Weyl later compared the scope and depth of his work to that of Emmy Noether.

When Schur's lectures were canceled in 1933, there was an outcry among the students and professors who appreciated him and liked him. By the efforts of his colleague Erhard Schmidt Schur was allowed to continue lecturing until the end of September 1935. Schur was the last Jewish professor who lost his job.

Zurich lecture

In Switzerland, Schur's colleagues Heinz Hopf and George Pólya were informed of the dismissal of Schur in 1935. They tried to help as best they could. On behalf of the Mathematical Seminars chief Michel Plancherel, on 12 December 1935 the school board president Arthur Rohn invited Schur to une série de conférences sur la théorie de la représentation des groupes finis. At the same time he asked that the formal invitation should come from President Rohn, comme le prof. Schur doit obtenir l'autorisation du ministère compétent de donner ces conférences. George Pólya arranged from this invitation of the Mathematical Seminars the Conference of the Department of Mathematics and Physics on 16 December. Meanwhile, on 14 December the official invitation letter from President Rohn had already been dispatched to Schur. Schur was promised for his guest lecture a fee of CHF 500.

Schur did not reply until 28 January 1936, on which day he was first in the possession of the required approval of the local authority. He declared himself willing to accept the invitation. He envisaged beginning the lecture on 4 February. Schur spent most of the month of February in Switzerland. Before his return to Germany he visited his daughter in Bern for a few days, and on 27 February he returned via Karlsruhe, where his sister lived, to Berlin. In a letter to Pólya from Berne, he concludes with the words: From Switzerland I take farewell with a heavy heart.

In Berlin, meanwhile, mathematician and Nazi Ludwig Bieberbach, in a letter dated 20 February 1936, informed the Reich Minister for Science, Art, and Education on the journey of Schur, and announced that he wanted to find out what was the content of the lecture in Zurich.

Significant students

Schur had 26 graduate students, some of whom acquired a mathematical reputation. Among them are

• Alfred Brauer, University of Berlin (1928)
• Richard Brauer, University of Berlin (1925)
• Karl Dörge, University of Berlin (1925)
• Bernhard Neumann, University of Berlin, Cambridge University (1932, 1935)
• Félix Pollaczek, University of Berlin (1922)
• Heinz Pruefer, University of Berlin, (1921)
• Richard Rado, University of Berlin, Cambridge University (1933, 1935)
• Isaac Jacob Schoenberg, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi (1926)
• Wilhelm Specht, University of Berlin (1932)
• Helmut Wielandt, University of Berlin (1935)

Legacy

Concepts named after Schur

Among others, the following concepts are named after Issai Schur:

• Schur algebra
• Schur complement
• Schur index
• Schur indicator
• Schur multiplier
• Schur orthogonality relations
• Schur polynomial
• Schur product
• Schur test
• Schur's inequality
• Schur's theorem
• Schur-convex function
• Schur–Weyl duality
• Lehmer–Schur algorithm
• Schur's property for normed spaces.
• Jordan–Schur theorem
• Schur–Zassenhaus theorem
• Schur triple
• Schur decomposition
• Schur's lower bound

Quotes

In his commemorative speech, Alfred Brauer (PhD candidate of Schur) spoke about Issai Schur as follows: As a teacher, Schur was excellent. His lectures were very clear, but not always easy and required cooperation – During the winter semester of 1930, the number of students who wanted to attend Schur's theory of numbers lecture, was such that the second largest university lecture hall with about 500 seats was too small. His most human characteristics were probably his great modesty, his helpfulness and his human interest in his students.

Heinz Hopf, who had been in Berlin before his appointment to Zurich at the ETH Privatdozent, held – as is clear from oral statements and also from letters – Issai Schur as a mathematician and greatly appreciated man. Here, this appreciation was based entirely on reciprocity: in a letter of 1930 to George Pólya on the occasion of the re-appointment of Hermann Weyl, Schur says of Hopf: Hopf is a very excellent teacher, a mathematician of strong temperament and strong effect, a master's discipline, trained excellent in other areas. – If I have to characterize him as a man, it may suffice if I say that I sincerely look forward to each time I meet with him.

Schur was, however, known for putting a correct distance in personal affairs. The testimony of Hopf is in accordance with statements of Schur's former students in Berlin, by Walter Ledermann and Bernhard Neumann.