Lably
Skip to content

Left communism

Left-wing variant of communism

  • 6 min read
  • 4 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Communism, Joseph Stalin and World War I

The Italian communist left is primarily made up of the Bordigist current and the Damenite current. These two currents mainly differ on the national question and the role of the communist party during a revolutionary period, with Bordigists considering themselves to be Leninist and Damenites considering themselves to be Luxemburgist. Both currents denounce Marxism–Leninism as a form of bourgeois opportunism materialized in the Soviet Union under Stalin and remained within the Communist International as one fraction until their expulsion. The Italian current of left communism was historically represented by the Italian Socialist Party and the Communist Party of Italy, but today is embodied in the Internationalist Communist Party of Italy, International Communist Party, and the International Communist Current.

The Dutch–German left split from Vladimir Lenin prior to Stalin's rule and supports a firmly council communist viewpoint, as opposed to the Italian left which emphasised the need for an international revolutionary party. The Dutch–German current of left communism was historically represented by the Communist Workers' Party of Germany, General Workers' Union of Germany, and the Communist Workers' International.

Although she was murdered in 1919, before left communism became a distinct tendency, Rosa Luxemburg has been heavily influential for most left communists, both politically and theoretically.

Proponents of left communism have included Herman Gorter, Anton Pannekoek, Otto Rühle, Karl Korsch, Amadeo Bordiga, Paul Mattick, Onorato Damen, Jacques Camatte, and Sylvia Pankhurst. Later prominent theorists are shared with other tendencies, such as Antonio Negri, a founding theorist of the autonomist tendency.

Early history and overview

Two major traditions can be observed within left communism, namely the Dutch–German current and the Italian current. The political positions those traditions share are opposition to popular fronts, to many kinds of nationalism and national liberation movements and to parliamentarianism.

The historical origins of left communism come from World War I. Most left communists are supportive of the October Revolution in Russia, but retain a critical view of its development. However, some in the Dutch–German current would in later years come to reject the idea that the revolution had a proletarian or socialist nature, arguing that it had simply carried out the tasks of the bourgeois revolution by creating a state capitalist system. The Dutch-German current criticised the Bolsheviks for use of the party form, and emphasised a more autonomous organisation of the working class without political parties. Damenites believe the Bolsheviks substituted the party in place of the class and had an economy of state capitalism. Bordigists begin their critique after the 2nd World Congress of the Communist International and characterize the economy as having developed into "state industrialism".

Left communism first came into focus as a distinct movement around 1918. Its essential features were a stress on the need to build a communist party or workers' council entirely separate from the reformist and centrist elements who "betrayed the proletariat", opposition to all but the most restricted participation in elections and an emphasis on militancy. Apart from this, there was little in common between the two wings. Only the Italians accepted the limited need for electoral work in elections in countries that have not firmly established bourgeois-democratic organs of government, attracting criticism from Vladimir Lenin in "Left-Wing" Communism: An Infantile Disorder.

The question of parliamentary participation would later contribute to the Internationalist Communist Party split in 1952 with Damenites favoring electoral activity such as with the 1946 Italian general election and 1948 Italian general election, while the Bordigists supported total abstention.

All currents have unique positions regarding trade union work. The Dutch-German current advocates for the immediate construction of revolutionary trade unions and worker organs, while the Damenites support the formation of new mass organizations outside the current trade unions, seeing the trade union form as historically obsolete and impossible to conquer everywhere. Bordigists still see the possibility of reconquering unions, although some currents deem certain unions impossible to agitate within or conquer.

Bordigists are distinct for their insistence on the organizational practice of organic centralism as opposed to democratic centralism, while Damenites adopt the term "dialectical centralism" to describe their practice. The Dutch-German current generally shuns centralism in favor of direct democratic procedures through class conscious workers without political parties.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Philosophy