Lably
Skip to content

Matching (statistics)

Statistical method

  • 2 min read
  • 2 chapters
  • 3 labs on Lably

Learn it on Lably

Matching has been promoted by Donald Rubin. It was prominently criticized in economics by Robert LaLonde (1986), who compared estimates of treatment effects from an experiment to comparable estimates produced with matching methods and showed that matching methods are biased. Rajeev Dehejia and Sadek Wahba (1999) reevaluated LaLonde's critique and showed that matching is a good solution. Similar critiques have been raised in political science and sociology journals.

Analysis

When the outcome of interest is binary, the most general tool for the analysis of matched data is conditional logistic regression as it handles strata of arbitrary size and continuous or binary treatments (predictors) and can control for covariates. In particular cases, simpler tests like paired difference test, McNemar test and Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel test are available.

When the outcome of interest is continuous, estimation of the average treatment effect is performed.

Matching can also be used to "pre-process" a sample before analysis via another technique, such as regression analysis.

Sign in to keep reading

One more chapter is free with a Lably account.

More in Statistics