Lably
Skip to content

Missing link (human evolution)

Non-scientific term for a transitional fossil

  • 4 min read
  • 3 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Fossil, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Jean-Baptiste Lamarck

The term "missing link" has fallen out of favor with anthropologists because it implies the evolutionary process is a linear phenomenon and that forms originate consecutively in a chain. Instead, last common ancestor is preferred since this does not have the connotation of linear evolution, as evolution is a branching process. Creationists have used the concept of a missing link to argue that evolution is not a valid theory.

There is no singular missing link. The scarcity of transitional fossils can be attributed to the incompleteness of the fossil record.

Historical origins

The term "missing link" was influenced by the 18th-century Enlightenment thinkers such as Alexander Pope and Jean-Jacques Rousseau who thought of humans as links in the Great Chain of Being, a hierarchical structure of all matter and life. Influenced by Aristotle's theory of higher and lower animals, the Great Chain of Being was created during the medieval period in Europe and was strongly influenced by religious thought. God was at the top of the chain followed by man and then animals. It was during the 18th century that the set nature of species and their immutable place in the great chain was questioned. The dual nature of the chain, divided yet united, had always allowed for seeing creation as essentially one continuous whole, with the potential for overlap between the links. Radical thinkers like Jean-Baptiste Lamarck saw a progression of life forms from the simplest creatures striving towards complexity and perfection, a schema accepted by zoologists like Henri de Blainville. The very idea of an ordering of organisms, even if supposedly fixed, laid the basis for the idea of transmutation of species, for example Charles Darwin's theory of evolution.

The earliest publication that explicitly uses the term “missing link” was in 1844 in Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation by Robert Chambers, which uses the term in an evolutionary context relating to gaps in the fossil record. Charles Lyell employed the term a few years later in 1851 in his third edition of Elements of Geology too as a metaphor for the missing gaps in the continuity of the geological column. It was used as a name for transitional types between different taxa in 1863, in Lyell's Geological Evidences of the Antiquity of Man.

Sign in to keep reading

2 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Animals