Oklahoma Enabling Act

Requirements for the Oklahoma Constitution

The Act included several other requirements for the Oklahoma Constitution:

• Citizens of the U.S. or members of tribes who have been resident in the territories for at least six months may participate in the constitutional convention and vote in the referendum.
• The capital shall temporarily be in Guthrie, Oklahoma, until 1913, when a referendum shall determine a permanent capital.
• Provisions shall be made for a public school system, free from sectarian control and with classes conducted in English (provided that foreign languages may be taught).
  • Section 16 and 36 of surplus lands be reserved for the benefit of common schools
  • Section 13 of surplus lands be reserved for the benefit of higher education, reserving 1/3 for the University of Oklahoma, 1/3 for the Agricultural and Mechanical College and Colored Agricultural Normal School, and 1/3 for Normal Schools
• That said State shall never enact any law restricting or Right of suffrage or abridging the right of suffrage on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude
• the Osage Indian Reservation be organized as a separate county in the new state
• Preservation of freedom of religion
• Prohibition of polygamy and plural marriage
• Prohibition of the manufacture, sale, barter or gift of liquor for 21 years after statehood
• "nothing contained in the said constitution shall be construed to limit or impair the rights of person or property pertaining to the Indians of said Territories (so long as such rights shall remain unextinguished) or to limit or affect the authority of the Government of the United States to make any law or regulation respecting such Indians, their lands, property, or other rights by treaties, agreement, law, or otherwise, which it would have been competent to make if this act had never been passed."

President Roosevelt proclaimed Oklahoma a state on November 16, 1907.

Equal footing doctrine

The requirement to keep Guthrie as the State's temporary capital was challenged in court after Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, won the election and the capital was moved prematurely. Coyle v. Smith was the U.S. Supreme Court Case that helped define the equal footing doctrine.

On December 29, 1910, the state of Oklahoma enacted a statute which removed the state capital from Guthrie to Oklahoma City. W.H. Coyle, owner of large property interests in Guthrie, sued the state of Oklahoma, arguing that the move was performed in violation of the state constitution's acceptance of the terms of Congress's enabling act.

The power given to Congress by Art. IV, § 3, of the Constitution is to admit new States to this Union, and relates only to such States as are equal to each other in power and dignity and competency to exert the residuum of sovereignty not delegated to the Federal Government.

The Supreme Court held that preventing the state of Oklahoma the right to locate its own seat of government deprived it of powers which all other states of the Union enjoyed, and thus violated the traditional constitutional principle that all new states be admitted "on an equal footing with the original states". As a result, the provision of the enabling act which temporarily restricted Oklahoma's right to determine where its seat of government would be was unconstitutional.

Enablement of Arizona and New Mexico statehood

The second part of the act provided for the enablement of the peoples of Arizona and New Mexico to form a state constitution and government in anticipation of admission to the union as a single state. However, the combined state was not admitted under these provisions; instead a separate act, the State Enablement Act of 1910, was enacted and was the statutory vehicle that led to their admissions as individual states.

Failure to disestablish reservations

A pair of U.S. Supreme Court cases first originating around 2015 challenged part of the Oklahoma Enabling Act by asserting that the Act failed to actually disestablish the reservation lands for the purposes of determining whether a crime committed on those lands was of the state's jurisdiction, if they had been disestablished, or federal, if they remained reservations, under the Major Crimes Act. In July 2020, the Supreme Court ruled that Congress had failed to disestablish the reservations in the Enabling Act and so for purposes of the Major Crimes Act, those lands that were former reservations should be considered Indian country, overseen by federal jurisdiction.