Pacificism
Ethical opposition to violence or war
- 1 min read
- 1 chapter
Related on Lably
Ceadel has categorized pacificism among positions about war and peace, ordering it among the other categories:
- Militarism (violence normalized)
- Crusading (interventionism)
- Defensivism (violence prevention)
- Pacificism (violence prevention and abolition)
- Pacifism (violence rejection)
Development
Pacificism ranges between total pacifism, which usually states that killing, violence or war is unconditionally wrong in all cases, and defensivism, which accepts all defensive acts as morally just. Pacificism states that war may ever be considered only as a firm "last resort" and condemns both aggression and militarism. In the 1940s, the two terms were not conceptually distinguished, and pacificism was considered merely an archaic spelling.
The term pacificism was first used in 1910 by William James. The distinct theory was later developed by A. J. P. Taylor in The Trouble-Makers (1957) and was subsequently defined by Ceadel in his 1987 book, Thinking About Peace and War. It was also discussed in detail in Richard Norman's book, Ethics, Killing and War. The concept came to mean "the advocacy of a peaceful policy."
The largest national peace association in history, the British League of Nations Union, was pacificist rather than pacifist in orientation. Historically, the majority of peace activists have been pacificists rather than strict pacifists.

