Paleopsephurus
- 2 min read
- 4 chapters
Related on Lably
Through Extinction, Type (biology) and Primitive (phylogenetics)
History and classification
The genus was described from three partial specimens currently residing in the collections of the University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. Specimen number 22206 U.M. is a complete and well preserved skull with some denticles, pectoral girdle and pectoral fins. The second and third specimens were found in a block of matrix from the same location as 2226 U.M.. Specimen 22207 U.M. is a portion of the caudal region of a paddlefish, while 22208 U.M. is a partial shoulder with associated pectoral fin. While the specimens were found close to each other, it is impossible to determine if they represent a single individual, and as such were described as three separate fish specimens. The specimens were collected from a sandstone outcrop of the Hell Creek Formation 24 miles (39 km) southeast of Fort Peck, Montana by a University of Michigan Museum of Paleontology expedition in 1938. the fossils were in close association with the holotype specimen of the extinct sturgeon Protoscaphirhynchus squamosus.
The Paleopsephurus specimens were first studied by American paleontologist and ichthyologist Archie Justus MacAlpin. He published his detailed 1947 type description in the journal Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan.
Sign in to keep reading
3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.
Description
The skull is about 274 millimetres (10.8 in) long, suggesting a total body length of about 56 centimetres (22 in). The skull roof is poorly preserved. The stellate bones are loosely packed and more poorly developed compared to the ones in Crossopholis or Polyodon, but are similar to those of Psephurus.
Ecology
Like other non-Polyodon paddlefish, Paleopsephurus was likely piscivorous.
Phylogeny
Paleopsephurus exhibits a combination of characters which suggests that it is more derived than Protopsephurus, but is more basal than Crossopholis, Polyodon, or Psephurus. Relationships of the genera, after Grande et al. (2002).