Lably
Skip to content

Persian astrology

  • 18 min read
  • 6 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Prime meridian

Many astrological concepts found in specialized texts today have their roots in Middle Persian and found their way into Latin through Arabic translations, including:

In examining the history of astrology in Iran and the Islamic era, scholars divide this development into three prominent periods:

  • Sasanian period: During this timeframe, Greek texts were translated into Middle Persian. Figures such as Zadanfarrukh Andarzgar played a key role in this process, and his writings later served as the foundation for astrologers in the Islamic era.
  • Transition of power to the Abbasids: With the rising prominence of Khorasan and the founding of Baghdad, Persian astrologers gained significant political and military influence. Figures such as Mashallah, Abu Ma'shar, and Sahl ibn Bishr served as close advisors to rulers in crucial decision-making and battles.
  • Fundamental achievements: During this era, two major branches were established. The first was "Horary astrology", which was used to find answers to everyday questions by casting a horoscope at that exact moment. The second was "Mundane astrology", in which various national and historical epochs were divided and forecasted based on great conjunctions (the conjunctions of Jupiter and Saturn) and the time of the sun's entry into Aries.

Ancient Persia

Astrology was incorporated into the religious and theological framework of Zoroastrianism particularly during the Sasanian period. According to Enrico G. Raffaelli, Zoroastrian priests probably possessed some knowledge of Mesopotamian astral divination and proto-astrology as early as the Achaemenid period, although there is insufficient evidence to determine whether these traditions influenced Zoroastrian theology before Sasanian times. Under the Sasanians, however, astrological doctrines entered the religious corpus itself. The Denkard, for example, presents Shapur I as recovering scientific and astral writings dispersed in India, Byzantium, and other lands. Although Raffaelli does not regard this account as strictly historical, it reflects a broader process through which astrological doctrines of Mesopotamian, Greek, and Indian origin were absorbed into Sasanian intellectual culture and adapted to Zoroastrian thought.

In this Zoroastrian reinterpretation, the celestial realm forms part of the cosmic struggle between good and evil. The Sun, Moon, stars, and zodiacal constellations are classified as beneficial entities, whereas the five planets and the lunar nodes belong to the evil astral forces; the irregular motion of the planets is among the features associated with their negative character. The richest account of these doctrines occurs in the Bundahishn, particularly in its fifth section. The text describes a “horoscope of the world” for the beginning of the period of cosmic mixture, in which several malefic astral bodies occupy positions of exceptional power. The configuration thus represents the initial predominance of evil and helps explain the imperfect and polluted condition of the present world. Although ultimately derived from classical astrology, this world horoscope was substantially reworked in the Zoroastrian tradition, with Raffaelli identifying elements derived from Indian astrological models.

Astrological concepts were also applied to human life and cosmic history. The horoscope of Gayomart, the primordial man, is the only individual birth chart known from Pahlavi literature, and his death at the age of thirty is explained astrologically through the changing positions and strengths of Saturn and Jupiter. The doctrine thereby makes death, regarded in Zoroastrian theology as one of the principal consequences of the assault of evil, part of an astrological scheme. Pahlavi texts also preserve doctrines of millennial chronocratoria, in which zodiacal constellations and especially Saturn exercise rulership over periods of cosmic history, anticipating themes associated with Sasanian historical astrology. In addition, the Anthologies of Zadspram contain a form of astrological melothesia connecting layers and parts of the human body—including marrow, bones, flesh, nerves, veins, skin, and hair—with celestial entities. Raffaelli interprets such doctrines as examples of the creative adaptation of astrological ideas of diverse origins to Zoroastrian cosmology and theology.

One of the distinctive features of the Bundahishn is its combination of traditional Zoroastrian cosmology with later astronomical and astrological learning. D. N. MacKenzie noted that this syncretism is particularly evident in its astrological sections. Fixed stars form part of the celestial forces of Ohrmazd, whereas the wandering planets are portrayed as destructive beings that invade the heavens and contend with the fixed stars. The text assigns individual planetary adversaries to stellar commanders: Mercury is opposed to Sirius, Jupiter to the Great Bear, Mars to Vega, Venus to Sadwēs, and Saturn to the Pole Star, while the Dragon (Gōzihr) and the tailed Muš Parīg are associated with the Sun and Moon.

The Bundahishn also contains what it explicitly calls the "horoscope of the world" (Middle Persian zāyč ī gēhān), representing the celestial configuration at the time of Ahriman's assault upon creation. Its ascendant is given as 19 degrees Cancer; Jupiter is placed in Cancer, Mercury in Virgo, Saturn in Libra, Mars in Capricorn, Venus in Pisces, the Sun in Aries, and the Moon in Taurus, while the Head and Tail of the Dragon occupy Gemini and Sagittarius respectively. MacKenzie's reconstruction of the diagram shows a twelve-house horoscope and demonstrates the extent to which technical astrology had been incorporated into the cosmological narrative of the Bundahishn.

The same text displays familiarity with a substantial body of technical astrological doctrine. It states that each planet in relation to the twelve zodiacal signs possesses its own house, detriment, exaltation, fall, terms, aspects and decans, together with benefic and malefic conditions and other configurations. These passages indicate that the redactors of the Bundahishn had access to a developed system of Hellenistic astrology, although its concepts were reinterpreted within a specifically Zoroastrian cosmological and theological framework.

Antonio Panaino has placed this material within the broader history of Iranian astral knowledge. He argues that the Avestan ritual texts contain no clear references to the five planets, whereas western Iranian communities, owing to their proximity to Mesopotamia, acquired a more developed knowledge of the wandering planets during the first millennium BCE. Four of the planets became associated with major Iranian deities: Jupiter with Ohrmazd, Mars with Wahrām, Venus with Anāhīd, and Mercury with Tīr. Saturn was exceptional, its Iranian name Kēwān being connected instead with a Mesopotamian designation expressing the idea of permanence or steadiness.

According to Panaino, the Zoroastrian demonization of the planets should not simply be derived from Manichaean influence. Rather, it developed through a reformulation of the Zoroastrian concept of the cosmic battle between the forces of Ohrmazd and Ahriman. Fixed stars were regarded as orderly divine protectors of the heavens, whereas the planets, with their apparently irregular motions, stations and retrogradations, could be interpreted as agents of disorder. Their astronomical behaviour thus acquired a moral and theological meaning within the Zoroastrian cosmological system. Panaino considers it more likely that this process began during the Seleucid and early Parthian periods, when Hellenistic astrology was becoming established in Iranian lands, rather than being a specifically Sasanian borrowing from Manichaeism.

This theological classification also created a tension with practical astrology. In conventional astrology Jupiter and Venus were benefic, Saturn and Mars malefic, while Mercury could assume either quality according to its configurations. Zoroastrian dualism, however, made such internal differentiation problematic: celestial beings were expected to belong either to the forces of order or to those of disorder. Consequently, the wandering planets as a class were assigned to the demonic side of the cosmic conflict, even though practical astrological doctrine continued to distinguish between benefic and malefic planets.

Sign in to keep reading

5 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Astronomy