Lably
Skip to content

Philippine tarsier

Species of primate

  • 11 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Endemism and Insectivore

Its geographic range also includes Maripipi Island, Siargao Island, Basilan Island and Dinagat Island. Tarsiers have also been reported in Sarangani, although they may be different subspecies.

Etymology and taxonomic history

The tarsier is named for its elongated "tarsus" or ankle bone. This tarsier is known locally as mawumag in Visayan languages including Cebuano, and magô in Waray. It is also known as mamag, magau, malmag, and magatilok-iok.

Taxonomic classification

The Philippine tarsier is the only member of the genus Carlito and a member of the family Tarsiidae. Three subspecies are recognised:

  • Family Tarsiidae
    • Genus Tarsius: found in Sulawesi
    • Genus Cephalopachus: found in Sundaland
    • Genus Carlito: found in Greater Mindanao
      • Species Carlito syrichta
        • Subspecies Carlito syrichta syrichta from Leyte and Samar
        • Subspecies Carlito syrichta fraterculus from Bohol
        • Subspecies Carlito syrichta carbonarius from Mindanao

Changes in taxonomy

Previously all living tarsiers had been placed in the genus Tarsius, but a 2010 taxonomic revision by Shekelle and Groves placed the distinctive Philippine tarsier in its own genus, Carlito named after Filipino conservationist Carlito Pizarras.

The Philippine tarsier was introduced to Western biologists in the 18th century through the missionary J.G. Camel's description given to J. Petiver of an animal said to have come from the Philippines. Petiver published Camel's description in 1705 and named the animal Cercopithecus luzonis minimus which was the basis for Linnaeus' (1758) Simia syrichta and eventually Carlito syrichta, the scientific name as of 2010.

The IUCN taxonomic note lists two subspecies, but the non-nominate one is poorly defined at present, so the species is treated as a whole. Tarsius syrichta carbonarius and Tarsius s. fraterculus were recognized by Hill (1955) as weakly defined subspecies. Niemitz (1984) found the differences to be insignificant based upon comparisons with museum specimens. Musser and Dagosto (1987) felt that the available museum specimens were insufficient to resolve the issue, but mentioned that Heaney felt that a single male tarsier from Dinagat might be distinct. Groves (2001) did not recognize any subspecies of C. syrichta, but Groves and Shekelle (2010) recognized the subspecies C. s. fraterculus, C. s. syrichta, and C. s. carbonarius when splitting the species of Tarsius into Carlito.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Organisms