Political fragmentation
Political process
- 1 min read
- 2 chapters
Related on Lably
Through Political organisation, One-party state and Authoritarianism
Effects of political fragmentation
Scholars, journalists, and politicians have theorized about a number of potential effects of political fragmentation. For example, it has been argued that higher fragmentation allows voters to better represent their political spectrum of political positions. The length of government coalition formation has also been argued to increase with number of parties and decreases with preexisting political groups. The strength of these effects has been hypothesized to depend on whether it is the government or the opposition that are fragmented. However, the political fragmentation of parliaments has little causal effect on a number of dimensions of the quality of democracy. The veto player theory predicts that higher fragmentation relates to gridlock, but other literature does not observe increased gridlock.
While one-party states are authoritarian, dominant-party systems can be democratic.
Sign in to keep reading
One more chapter is free with a Lably account.
Factors affecting level of political fragmentation
The political fragmentation, represented by effective number of parties, is roughly estimated with the seat product model, and increases with district magnitude and assembly size. The political fragmentation tends to move towards an equilibrium, depending on the voting system. Duverger's law predicts majoritarian elections with district magnitude of one favor a two-party system and proportional representation increases the number of parties. In proportional representation, higher electoral thresholds tend to reduce the number of parties since voters voting for smaller parties have a higher risk of having their votes wasted.
Strong autocrats can prefer a fragmented political system, while weaker autocrats can prefer a low level of party fragmentation.