Lably
Skip to content

Pratihara dynasty

Northern Indian dynasty (730–1036)

  • 12 min read
  • 6 chapters
  • 1 lab on Lably
Coin of Bhoja-I, Pratihara Dynasty
User:Ancientcoinsofindia1 , English Wikipedia · CC BY 2.5

Learn it on Lably

The Pratiharas were instrumental in containing Arab armies to the west of Indus River. Nagabhata I defeated an Arab army during the Caliphate campaigns in India. Under Nagabhata II, the Pratiharas became the most powerful dynasty in northern India. He was succeeded by his son Ramabhadra, who ruled briefly before being succeeded by his son, Mihira Bhoja. Under Bhoja and his successor Mahendrapala I, the Pratihara dynasty reached its peak of prosperity and power. By the time of Mahendrapala, the extent of its territory rivalled that of the Gupta Empire stretching from the border of Sindh in the west to Bengal in the east and from the Himalayas in the north to areas past the Narmada in the south. The expansion triggered a tripartite power struggle with the Rashtrakuta and Pala empires for control of northern India. During this period, Imperial Pratihara took the title of Maharajadhiraja of Āryāvarta (Great King of Kings of Aryan Lands).

The power of the Pratihara dynasty was weakened by dynastic strife, and further diminished as a result of a great raid led by the Rashtrakuta ruler Indra III who, in about 916, sacked Kannauj. Under a succession of rather obscure rulers, the dynasty never regained its former influence. Their feudatories became increasingly powerful, throwing off their allegiance until, by the end of the tenth century, the dynasty controlled little more than the Gangetic Doab. Their last important king, Rajyapala, was killed by Vidyadhara for fleeing from Kannauj and subsequently returning to surrender to Mahmud of Ghazni in 1018. Vidyadhara placed his son Trilochanpala on the throne as the proxy of the Chandela Empire. Jasapala, the last Pratihara ruler of Kannauj, died in 1036.

Etymology and origin

The origin of the dynasty and the meaning of the term 'Gurjara' in its name is disputed among historians. The rulers of this dynasty used the self-designation 'Pratihara' for their clan, and never referred to themselves as Gurjaras. They claimed descent from the legendary hero Lakshmana, who is said to have acted as a pratihara ("door-keeper") for his brother Rama.

Multiple inscriptions of their neighbouring dynasties describe the Pratiharas as Gurjara. The term Gurjara-Pratihara occurs only in the Rajor inscription of a feudatory ruler named Mathanadeva, who describes himself as a Gurjara-Pratihara. According to one school of thought, Gurjara was the name of the territory, Gurjaradesa, originally ruled by the Pratiharas; gradually, the term came to denote the people of this territory. An opposing theory is that Gurjara was the name of the tribe to which the dynasty belonged, and Pratihara was a clan of this tribe.

Among those who believe that the term Gurjara was originally a tribal designation, there are disagreements over whether they were native Indians or foreigners. The proponents of the foreign origin theory point out that the Pratiharas suddenly emerged as a political power in north India around sixth century CE, shortly after the Hunas' invasion of the region. According to them Gujara-Pratiharas were "likely" formed from a fusion of the Alchon Huns ("White Huns") and native Indian elements, and can probably be considered as a Hunnic state, although the precise origins remain unclear. Critics of this theory argue that there is no conclusive evidence of their foreign origin: they were well-assimilated in the Indian culture. Moreover, if they invaded India through the north-west, it is inexplicable why would they choose to settle in the semi-arid area of present-day Rajasthan, rather than the fertile Indo-Gangetic Plain. While scholars such as R. K. Gupta and S. R. Bakshi who have doubted the theory of foreign origin for Gurjaras have also opined that Gurjara-Pratiharas were among the first Rajput dynasties.

The Agnivansha legend first recorded in the 11th century Navasahananka charita by Padmagupta narrates the official origin for the Parmara dynasty. This legend was later appropriated by other dynasties including Chaulukyas, eventually making its way into Prithviraj Raso. According to the legend, the Pratiharas, Parmar, Chauhan and Chaulukya dynasties originated from a sacrificial fire-pit (agnikunda) at Mount Abu. Some colonial-era historians interpreted this myth to suggest a foreign origin for these dynasties. According to this theory, the foreigners were admitted in the Hindu caste system after performing a fire ritual. However, this legend is not found in the earliest available copies of Prithviraj Raso. It is based on a Paramara legend composed when the threat of Muslim invasions was not considered serious by Rajput states of North West and Central India. This legend was utilised in the 16th century by bards to claim a heroic descent of clans in order to foster Rajput unity against the Mughals.

Sign in to keep reading

5 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Post-classical