Redology
- 1 min read
- 2 chapters
Explore on Lably
ToursExplore Lably’s 3D toursHistory
A 1976 essay by Joey Bonner split the Chinese critical reception of the novel into five phases:
- Pre-1791
- Commentators on the pre-publication manuscripts, such as Rouge Inkstone and Odd Tablet, who mainly provide literary analysis of the first 80 chapters.
- 1791–1900
- Post-publication questions over authorship of the addendum, speculation upon esoteric aspects of the book. After 1875 using the term "Redology" for the studies.
- 1900–1922
- Political interpretations.
- 1922–1953
- "New Redology" led by Hu Shih, approach questions of textual authenticity, documentation, dating, and a strong autobiographical focus. The labelling of previous periods as "Old Redology".
- 1954–current [1975]
- Marxist literary criticism, the book seen as a criticism of society's failures. Li Xifan's criticism of both Old Redology and Neo-Redologists such as Hu Shih and Yu Pingbo.
Sign in to keep reading
One more chapter is free with a Lably account.
Academic research institutes
There are many Redology academic institutions, especially university affiliated ones:
- The Society of the Dream of the Red Chamber (中国红楼梦学会) in Beijing
- The Cao Xueqin Society of Beijing (北京曹雪芹学会) in Beijing
- The Cao Xueqin Center for Aesthetics and Art (北京大学曹雪芹美学艺术研究中心) at Peking University, Beijing
- The Weiming Society for Hongloumeng Studies at Peking University, Beijing
- International Research Center of the Dream of the Red Chamber (RDRC), National Dong Hwa University College of Humanities and Social Sciences, Taiwan
- Dream of the Red Chamber Research Centre, University of Malaya, Malaysia

