Lably
Skip to content

Soviet art

  • 11 min read
  • 3 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Russian Revolution, Soviet Union and Joseph Stalin

Soviet art of the post-revolutionary period

During the 1920s, there was intense ideological competition between different artistic groupings striving to determine the forms and directions in which Soviet art would develop, seeking to occupy key posts in cultural institutions and to win the favor and support of the authorities.

In the late 1920s, the government became more focused on evaluating sexuality in art through the lens of socialist morality. This resulted in increased criticism of artists like Kasyan Goleizovsky and Alexander Grinberg.

This struggle was made even more bitter by the growing crisis of radical leftist art. At the turn of the 1930s, many avant-garde tendencies had exhausted themselves, and their former proponents began depicting real-life objects as they attempted to return to the traditional system of painted images, including the leading Jack of Diamonds artists. In the early 1930s, Kazimir Malevich (1879–1935) returned to figurative art.

A group of prominent supporters of leftist views included David Shterenberg, Alexander Drevin, Vladimir Tatlin, Wassily Kandinsky, Kazimir Malevich, Osip Brik, Sofya Dymshits-Tolstaya, Olga Rozanova, Mikhail Matyushin, and Nathan Altman. They held positions within the Soviet government and local Moscow and Petrograd Soviets, determining the policy of the Fine Arts department.

The position of the Fine Arts Department was most fully expressed by Nikolay Punin in 1919. He wrote: "If the depiction of the world does aid cognition, then only at the very earliest stages of human development, after which it already becomes either a direct hindrance to the growth of art or a class-based interpretation of it", and "The element of depiction is already an element characteristic of a bourgeois understanding of art".

Representatives of Russian art who had begun their careers before the revolution pointed out the danger of a break with the traditions of progressive pre-revolutionary art and the art school. These included Dmitry Kardovsky, Isaak Brodsky, Alexander Savinov, Abram Arkhipov, Boris Kustodiev, Kuzma Petrov-Vodkin, Arkady Rylov, Anna Ostroumova-Lebedeva, Mikhail Avilov, Alexander Samokhvalov, Boris Ioganson, Rudolf Frentz, and others. In the 1920s, the development of Soviet art and its art school was influenced by the incessant polemics and contests between various artistic tendencies.

Proletkult was formed just days before the October Revolution and aimed to put all arts at the service of the dictatorship of the proletariat. Initially supported by Narkompros, it eventually declined considerably and was disbanded in 1932..

The avant-garde movement attracted the interests of the Proletkult organization, which was highly eclectic in its art forms and included modern directions like impressionism and cubism.

Among the early experiments of Proletkult was the pragmatic aesthetic of industrial art, the prominent theorist being Boris Arvatov (1896–1940).

Another group was UNOVIS, a very short-lived but influential collection of young artists led by Kazimir Malevich in the 1920s.

After the 1917 discovery of porcelain in the State Porcelain Manufactory, it was also used for propaganda purposes. This porcelain was intended less for everyday use and more for decoration. As early as the 1920s, there were exhibitions of porcelain outside the Soviet Union.

Sign in to keep reading

2 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Contemporary