Lably
Skip to content

Stationary spacetime

  • 2 min read
  • 2 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Spacetime

Description and analysis

In a stationary spacetime, the metric tensor components, gμν, may be chosen so that they are all independent of the time coordinate. The line element of a stationary spacetime has the form (i,j=1,2,3)

ds2=λ(dt−ωidyi)2−λ−1hijdyidyj,

where t is the time coordinate, yi are the three spatial coordinates and hij is the metric tensor of 3-dimensional space. In this coordinate system the Killing vector field ξμ has the components ξμ=(1,0,0,0). λ is a positive scalar representing the norm of the Killing vector, i.e., λ=gμνξμξν, and ωi is a 3-vector, called the twist vector, which vanishes when the Killing vector is hypersurface orthogonal. The latter arises as the spatial components of the twist 4-vector ωμ=eμνρσξν∇ρξσ(see, for example, p. 163) which is orthogonal to the Killing vector ξμ, i.e., satisfies ωμξμ=0. The twist vector measures the extent to which the Killing vector fails to be orthogonal to a family of 3-surfaces. A non-zero twist indicates the presence of rotation in the spacetime geometry.

The coordinate representation described above has an interesting geometrical interpretation. The time translation Killing vector generates a one-parameter group of motion G in the spacetime M. By identifying the spacetime points that lie on a particular trajectory (also called orbit) one gets a 3-dimensional space (the manifold of Killing trajectories) V=M/G, the quotient space. Each point of V represents a trajectory in the spacetime M. This identification, called a canonical projection, π:M→V is a mapping that sends each trajectory in M onto a point in V and induces a metric h=−λπ∗g on V via pullback. The quantities λ, ωi and hij are all fields on V and are consequently independent of time. Thus, the geometry of a stationary spacetime does not change in time. In the special case ωi=0 the spacetime is said to be static. By definition, every static spacetime is stationary, but the converse is not generally true, as the Kerr metric provides a counterexample.

Sign in to keep reading

One more chapter is free with a Lably account.

More in Physics