Lably
Skip to content

Superluminal motion

Apparent faster-than-light motion of distant astronomical objects

  • 7 min read
  • 3 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Astronomy, Speed of light and Black hole

Explanation

Superluminal motion occurs as a special case of a more general phenomenon arising from the difference between the apparent speed of distant objects moving across the sky and their actual speed as measured at the source.

In tracking the movement of such objects across the sky, their speed can be calculated by simply dividing distance by time. If the distance of the object from the Earth is known and the angular speed of the object can be measured, then the speed can be calculated as:

apparent speed = distance to object × angular speed.

But this calculation does not yield the actual speed of the object, as it assumes the light travels the same amount of time for each of two (or more) separate observations. But when there is a velocity component directed towards the observer, light that is emitted later has to travel a shorter distance, and thus has a shorter travel time. For example, in a jet moving towards the observer at 0.9c and laterally at 0.2c, light emitted a year later will be emitted from a point 0.2 LY to the side, but it will also be 0.9LY closer to the observer, so it will only arrive 0.1 years later. Thus the observer will see, over the course of a tenth of a year, the source of the light move by 0.2 LY, an apparent motion of twice the speed of light.

The effect grows more pronounced the greater the velocity component directed towards the observer. This means that in most cases, 'superluminal' objects are traveling almost directly towards the Earth. However it is not strictly necessary for this to be the case, and superluminal motion can still be observed in objects with appreciable velocities not directed towards the Earth.

Superluminal motion is most often observed in two opposing jets emanating from the core of a star or black hole. In this case, one jet is moving away from and one towards the Earth. If Doppler shifts are observed in both sources, the velocity and the distance can be determined independently of other observations.

Some contrary evidence

As early as 1983, at the "superluminal workshop" held at Jodrell Bank Observatory, referring to the seven then-known superluminal jets,

Schilizzi ... presented maps of arc-second resolution [showing the large-scale outer jets] ... which ... have revealed outer double structure in all but one (3C 273) of the known superluminal sources. An embarrassment is that the average projected size [on the sky] of the outer structure is no smaller than that of the normal radio-source population.

In other words, the jets are evidently not, on average, close to the Earth's line-of-sight. (Their apparent length would appear much shorter if they were.)

In 1993, Thomson et al. suggested that the (outer) jet of the quasar 3C 273 is nearly collinear to the Earth's line-of-sight. Superluminal motion of up to ~9.6c has been observed along the (inner) jet of this quasar.

Superluminal motion of up to 6c has been observed in the inner parts of the jet of M87. To explain this in terms of the "narrow-angle" model, the jet must be no more than 19° from the Earth's line-of-sight. But evidence suggests that the jet is in fact at about 43° to the Earth's line-of-sight. The same group of scientists later revised that finding and argue in favour of a superluminal bulk movement in which the jet is embedded.

Suggestions of turbulence and/or "wide cones" in the inner parts of the jets have been put forward to try to counter such problems, and there seems to be some evidence for this.

Signal velocity

The model identifies a difference between the information carried by the wave at its signal velocity c, and the information about the wave front's apparent rate of change of position. If a light pulse is envisaged in a wave guide (glass tube) moving across an observer's field of view, the pulse can only move at c through the guide. If that pulse is also directed towards the observer, he will receive that wave information, at c. If the wave guide is moved in the same direction as the pulse, the information on its position, passed to the observer as lateral emissions from the pulse, changes. He may see the rate of change of position as apparently representing motion faster than c when calculated, like the edge of a shadow across a curved surface. This is a different signal, containing different information, to the pulse and does not break the second postulate of special relativity. c is strictly maintained in all local fields.

Sign in to keep reading

2 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Astronomy