Susan Neiman

Major works

Evil in Modern Thought

Evil in Modern Thought writes the history of modern philosophy as a series of responses to the existence of evil – that which, whether in the form of innocent suffering or human action intentionally causing it, "threatens our sense of the sense of the world." Neiman argues that the problem of evil provides a better framework than epistemology for understanding the history of philosophy because it includes a wider range of texts, forms a link between metaphysics and ethics, and is more faithful to philosophers' stated concerns. Indeed, Neiman believes that evil, by challenging the intelligibility of the world as a whole, lies at the root of all philosophical inquiry.

The book explores the period from the early Enlightenment to the late 20th century through discussions of philosophers who often figure in traditional histories of philosophy, such as Leibniz, Kant, Hegel, Nietzsche, and Schopenhauer, as well ones who do not, such as Pierre Bayle, Sigmund Freud, Albert Camus, Emmanuel Levinas, and Hannah Arendt. Neiman groups thinkers around two basic distinctions: one between those who believe in a guiding order beyond appearances and those who think that sensory experience is all we have for orientation; and another between those who believe we must try to understand evil and those who maintain that doing so would be immoral on the grounds that any explanation of evil would be tantamount to its justification.

Moral Clarity

In Moral Clarity, Neiman argues that all human beings have moral needs but that secular culture, particularly on the political left, is reluctant or unable to satisfy them, and as a consequence has ceded the moral domain to religion and traditional conservatives. She attributes this failing not to a lack of values but to a lack of a "standpoint from which those values make sense." The book explores the reasons why this is so and offers a framework for moral thinking based on Enlightenment ideas, particularly those of Kant and Rousseau, which rely neither on divine authority nor on authoritarian ideology.

Why Grow Up?

In Why Grow Up, Neiman challenges the infantilism that she believes is widespread in modern society. She suggests that the "forces that shape our world" encourage consumerism, apathy, cynicism, and the fetishization of beauty and youth in order to keep citizens passive and compliant. These, she thinks, are propped up by a conception of adulthood in which being an adult is synonymous with drudgery, resignation, and inevitable decline.

Neiman makes the case for an ideal of adulthood that involves exercising judgement, understanding one's own culture through immersion in others, actively shaping society, and seeking orientation in the face of uncertainty. As in Moral Clarity, Neiman draws on the work of Kant, Rousseau, Arendt, and other philosophers to argue for a concept of maturity in which thinking critically does not mean abandoning one's ideals.

Learning from the Germans

Her 2019 book Learning from the Germans examines German efforts to atone for Nazi atrocities and identifies lessons for how the U.S. might come to terms with its legacy of slavery and racism. The book brings together historical and philosophical analysis; interviews with politicians, activists, and contemporary witnesses in Germany and the United States; and Neiman's own first-person observations as a white woman growing up in the South and a Jewish woman who has lived for almost three decades in Berlin.

Left Is Not Woke

In Left Is Not Woke, Neiman examines the assumptions behind "woke" politics and argues that they are at odds with what the left has always stood for: "universalism over tribalism, a firm distinction between justice and power, and a belief in the possibility of progress." She is particularly concerned that tribalism will undermine the left's political goals and leave it without the tools to oppose the far right, whose outlook has always been tribalist. Neiman traces woke thinking back to Michel Foucault, Carl Schmitt, and the postmodern thinkers they influenced, though she also finds similar views articulated by the character of Thrasymachus in Plato's Republic.

Selected bibliography

Books

• Left is Not Woke, Polity, 2023.
• Learning from the Germans: Race and the Memory of Evil, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2019.
• Widerstand der Vernunft: Ein Manifest in postfaktischen Zeiten, Ecowin, 2017.
• Why Grow Up?, Penguin, 2014 (part of the series Philosophy in Transit). [Reprinted as Why Grow Up? Subversive Thoughts for an Infantile Age, Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 2015.]
• Moral Clarity: A Guide for Grown-Up Idealists, Harcourt, 2008.
• Fremde sehen anders: Zur Lage der Bundesrepublik, Suhrkamp, 2005.
• Evil in Modern Thought: An Alternative History of Philosophy, Princeton University Press, 2002.
• The Unity of Reason: Rereading Kant, Oxford University Press, 1994.
• Slow Fire: Jewish Notes from Berlin, Schocken, 1992.

Articles and book chapters

• “Corona as Chance: Overcoming the Tyranny of Self-Interest,” in Kahn and Maduro, eds., Democracy in Times of Pandemic, Cambridge University Press, 2020.
• "Understanding the Problem of Evil" in Chignell, ed., Evil: Oxford Philosophical Concepts, Oxford University Press, 2019.
• "A Dialogue Between Business and Philosophy" (with Bertrand Collomb) in Rangan, ed., Capitalism Beyond Mutuality? Perspectives Integrating Philosophy and Social Science, Oxford University Press, 2018.
• "Amerikanische Träume," in Honneth, Kemper, and Klein, ed., Bob Dylan, Suhrkamp, 2017.
• "Ideas of Reason," in Rangan, ed., Performance and Progress: Essays on Capitalism, Business, and Society, Oxford University Press, 2015.
• "Forgetting Hiroshima, Remembering Auschwitz: Tales of Two Exhibits," Thesis Eleven, 129(1), 2015: 7–26.
• "Victims and Heroes," in Matheson, ed., The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, University of Utah Press, 2012.
• "Subversive Einstein," in Galison, Holton and Schweber, ed., Einstein for the 21st Century, Princeton University Press, 2008.

Newspaper and magazine articles

• "Fanon the Universalist," New York Review of Books, June 6, 2024.
• “Why the World Still Needs Immanuel Kant,” The New York Times, April 17, 2024.
• "Germany on Edge," New York Review of Books, November 3, 2023.
• "Historical Reckoning Gone Haywire," New York Review of Books, October 19, 2023.
• "Longing for Reconciliation," "The philosopher Jacob Taubes was torn between the desire to heal the split between Judaism and Christianity," The New York Review of Books, 2023
• "The True Left Is Not Woke" UnHerd, 2023.
• "There Are No Nostalgic Nazi Memorials," The Atlantic, 2019.
• "Working Off the Past, from Atlanta to Berlin," The New York Review of Books, 2019.
• "Germany paid Holocaust Reparations. Will the U.S. Do the Same for Slavery?" Los Angeles Times, 2019.
• "The President of Our Country is Evil," Salon, 2017.
• "In Germany, Monuments Reflect the Nation's Values," Miami Herald, 2017.
• "Die Deutschen sollten keine Angst haben," Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 2016.
• "What Americans Abroad Know about Bernie Sanders," Los Angeles Times, 2016.
• "An Enlightenment for Grownups," Spiked Review, 2016.
• "Antimodernismus: Die Quelle allen Unglücks?" Die Zeit, 2016.
• "Deutschland hat sich positiv verändert. Das beglückt mich," Die Zeit, 2016.
• "Aufklärung heißt nicht, nur nach mehr Toleranz zu rufen!" Der Tagesspiegel, 2016.
• "The Rationality of the World: A Philosophical Reading of the Book of Job," ABC Religion and Ethics, 2016.
• "Hört auf, Antisemiten zu zählen!" Die Zeit, 2014.
• "History and Guilt," Aeon, 2013.
• "Was ist Religion?" Die Zeit, 2013.
• "What It All Means," The New York Times, 2011.
• "Is Morality Driven by Faith?" The Washington Post/Newsweek, 2008.