Techno-fascism (Japanese)

The term expands upon Georges Gurvitch's earlier definition of "techno-bureaucratic fascism." It serves as a theoretical framework to bridge the gap between postwar Marxist historiography that primarily focused on the monopoly capitalism and imperialism of the zaibatsu, and political scientist Masao Maruyama's focus on how the psychological pathologies of the Japanese state created a system of irresponsibility.

Historiography

Within the broader debate on Emperor-system fascism, the concept of techno-fascism argues that the true architects of Japan's wartime state were not traditionalist conservatives or the fanatical military officers of the Imperial Way Faction, but rather a class of young and highly educated technocrats.

These planners viewed both classical laissez-faire capitalism and Soviet communism as obsolete in the face of the Great Depression and modern total war. Instead, they embraced fascism as an modern third way, rejecting the agrarian views of traditional right-wing factions in favor of rationalization, technological planning, and a managerial state prioritizing the "organization man" and public profits over private enterprise.

The Emperor system was incorporated into this system, as the emperor's divine mythos provided the necessary spiritual and cultural legitimacy to enforce an authoritarian economic plan upon the populace.