Lably
Skip to content

Three-domain system

Hypothesis for classification of life

  • 4 min read
  • 4 chapters
  • 5 labs on Lably

Learn it on Lably

The three-domain system has been contested by scientists who believe that eukaryotes do not form a separate domain of life, but instead represent a clade alongside the Archaea, in a single shared domain.

As of the mid 2020s, a consensus has emerged that eukaryotes had evolved from an archaeal host with affinities to living Asgard archaea, in combination with an endosymbiont belonging to Alphaproteobacteria, rather than eukaryotes being separate sister grouping to Archaea.

Background

Woese argued, on the basis of differences in 16S rRNA genes, that bacteria, archaea, and eukaryotes each arose separately from an ancestor with poorly developed genetic machinery, often called a progenote. To reflect these primary lines of descent, he treated each as a domain, divided into several different kingdoms. Originally his split of the prokaryotes was into Eubacteria (now Bacteria) and Archaebacteria (now Archaea). Woese initially used the term "kingdom" to refer to the three primary phylogenic groupings, and this nomenclature was widely used until the term "domain" was adopted in 1990.

Acceptance of the validity of Woese's phylogenetically valid classification was a slow process. Prominent biologists including Salvador Luria and Ernst Mayr objected to his division of the prokaryotes. Not all criticism of him was restricted to the scientific level. A decade of labor-intensive oligonucleotide cataloging left him with a reputation as "a crank", and Woese would go on to be dubbed "Microbiology's Scarred Revolutionary" by a news article printed in the journal Science in 1997. The growing amount of supporting data led the scientific community to accept the Archaea by the mid-1980s. Today, very few scientists still accept the concept of a unified Prokarya.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Biology