Lably
Skip to content

Webster's Dictionary

Dictionary developed by Noah Webster and other dictionaries using his name

  • 11 min read
  • 4 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Dictionary, William Shakespeare and Optical character recognition

Merriam-Webster is the corporate heir to Noah Webster's original works, which are in the public domain.

Noah Webster's dictionaries

A Compendious Dictionary of the English Language (1806)

Noah Webster, the author of the readers' and spelling books that dominated the American market at the time, spent decades of research in compiling his dictionaries. His first dictionary, A Compendious Dictionary of the English Language, appeared in 1806. In it, he popularized features which would become a hallmark of American English spelling (center rather than centre, honor rather than honour, program rather than programme, etc.) and included technical terms from the arts and sciences rather than confining his dictionary to literary words. Webster was a proponent of English spelling reform for reasons both philological and nationalistic. In A Companion to the American Revolution (2008), John Algeo notes: "it is often assumed that characteristically American spellings were invented by Noah Webster. He was very influential in popularizing certain spellings in America, but he did not originate them. Rather [. . .] he chose already existing options such as center, color and check on such grounds as simplicity, analogy or etymology." In William Shakespeare's First Folios, for example, spellings such as center and color are the most common. He spent the next two decades working to expand his dictionary.

An American Dictionary of the English Language

First edition (1828)

In 1828, when Noah Webster was 70, he published An American Dictionary of the English Language, printed by S. Converse in two quarto volumes containing 70,000 entries, far greater than the 58,000 of the largest previous dictionary. There were 2,500 copies printed, at $20 (equivalent to $586 in 2025) for the two volumes. At first the set sold poorly. When he lowered the price to $15 (equivalent to $440 in 2025), its sales improved, and by 1836 that edition was exhausted. "Not all copies were bound at the same time; the book also appeared in publisher's boards; other original bindings of a later date are not unknown."

Second edition (1841)

In 1841, 82-year-old Noah Webster published a second edition of his lexicographical masterpiece with the help of his son, William G. Webster. Its title page does not claim the status of second edition, merely noting that this new edition was the "first edition in octavo" in contrast to the quarto format of the first edition of 1828. Again in two volumes, the title page proclaimed that the Dictionary contained "the whole vocabulary of the quarto, with corrections, improvements and several thousand additional words: to which is prefixed an introductory dissertation on the origin, history and connection of the languages of western Asia and Europe, with an explanation of the principles on which languages are formed. B. L. Hamlen of New Haven, Connecticut, prepared the 1841 printing of the second edition.

When Webster died in 1843, his heirs sold unbound sheets of the 1841 revision to the firm of J. S. & C. Adams of Amherst, Massachusetts. This firm bound and published a small number of copies in 1844. It was one of these copies that Emily Dickinson used as a tool for her poetic composition. However, a $15 (equivalent to $518 in 2025) price tag on the book made it too expensive to sell easily, so Adams decided to sell the rights. G & C Merriam Co. of Springfield, Massachusetts acquired rights from Adams, and contracted with Webster's heirs for sole rights.

The third printing of the second edition in 1845 was the first Webster's Dictionary with a Merriam imprint.

Influence

Lepore (2008) demonstrates Webster's innovative ideas about language and politics and shows why Webster's endeavors were at first so poorly received. Culturally conservative Federalists denounced the work as radical – too inclusive in its lexicon and even bordering on vulgar. Meanwhile, Webster's old foes, the Jeffersonian Republicans, attacked the man, labeling him mad for such an undertaking.

Scholars have long seen Webster's 1844 dictionary to be an important resource for reading poet Emily Dickinson's life and work; she once commented that the "Lexicon" was her "only companion" for years. One biographer said, "The dictionary was no mere reference book to her; she read it as a priest his breviary – over and over, page by page, with utter absorption.";

Austin (2005) explores the intersection of lexicographical and poetic practices in American literature, and attempts to map out a "lexical poetics" using Webster's dictionaries. He shows the ways in which American poetry has inherited Webster and drawn upon his lexicography to reinvent it. Austin explicates key definitions from both the Compendious (1806), and American (1828) dictionaries and brings into its discourse a range of concerns including the politics of American English, the question of national identity and culture in the early moments of American independence, and the poetics of citation and of definition.

Webster's dictionaries were a redefinition of Americanism within the context of an emergent and unstable American socio-political and cultural identity. Webster's identification of his project as a "federal language" shows his competing impulses towards regularity and innovation in historical terms. Perhaps the contradictions of Webster's project represented a part of a larger dialectical play between liberty and order within Revolutionary and post-Revolutionary political debates.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Language and linguistics