Lably
Skip to content

1 Maccabees

Biblical text about the Maccabean Revolt

  • 18 min read
  • 11 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Christians

The author is anonymous, but he probably wrote in the newly independent Hasmonean kingdom after the success of the Maccabean Revolt in the late 2nd century BC. 1 Maccabees was probably written in Hebrew originally. However, this original Hebrew has been lost, and the work survives only in translation in Koine Greek in the Septuagint, the Greek version of the Jewish scriptures. The Septuagint was preserved by Christians as the basis for the Christian Old Testament. It became part of the deuterocanon in early Christianity. The book is held as canonical scripture today in the Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Oriental Orthodox churches (except for the Orthodox Tewahedo). The book is not included in the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) and is not recognized as canonical by Protestant denominations or any of the major branches of Judaism. Some Protestants include the book in the biblical apocrypha, as material useful for background and edification but not canonical. Rabbinic Judaism generally disapproved of the rule of the Hasmonean dynasty, but the book is openly pro-Hasmonean, one of several factors contributing to its lack of enthusiasm within later Judaism.

1 Maccabees is best known for its account of the recapture of Jerusalem in the year 164 BC and rededication of the Second Temple: the origin behind the Jewish holiday of Hanukkah.

Authorship and date

The author of 1 Maccabees is anonymous and unknown. He wrote in the post-independence Hasmonean kingdom, probably during the reign of High Priest John Hyrcanus (r. 134–104 BC), with a few scholars suggesting that early in the reign of Alexander Jannaeus (r. 103–76 BC) is also a possibility. All agree that the book was written before 63 BC, as the author shows great admiration toward Rome and does not know of the Roman general Pompey conquering Jerusalem and reducing the Hasmonean kingdom to a client state of the Roman Republic in that year. He was likely a court historian or equivalent. The author appears to be very familiar with Judea and its geography, but appears less well-informed about the wider Hellenistic world. The entire work is generally considered to be a unity composed by a single author on both philological and thematic grounds, although there are occasional short passages sometimes contested as potentially being added at a later date.

Sign in to keep reading

10 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Philosophy and religion