Lably
Skip to content

Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Bacterium, genetic engineering tool

  • 13 min read
  • 9 chapters
Agrobacterium tumefaciens [bacteria] as they begin to infect a carrot cell. In the process, the bacteria's genetic material will enter the plant cell.
A. G. Matthysse, K. V. Holmes, R. H. G. Gurlitz · Public domain

Related on Lably

Through Gram-negative bacteria, Bacteria and Genome

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is an Alphaproteobacterium of the family Rhizobiaceae, which includes the nitrogen-fixing legume symbionts. Unlike the nitrogen-fixing symbionts, tumor-producing Agrobacterium species are pathogenic and do not benefit the plant. The wide variety of plants affected by Agrobacterium makes it of great concern to the agriculture industry.

Economically, A. tumefaciens is a serious pathogen of walnuts, grape vines, stone fruits, nut trees, sugar beets, horseradish, and rhubarb, and the persistent nature of the tumors or galls caused by the disease make it particularly harmful for perennial crops.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens grows optimally at 28 °C (82 °F). The doubling time can range from 2.5–4h depending on the media, culture format, and level of aeration. At temperatures above 30 °C (86 °F), A. tumefaciens begins to experience heat shock which is likely to result in errors in cell division.

Taxonomy and scope

The classification of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and related species, collectively the Agrobacterium tumefaciens species complex, has greatly outpaced the change in terminology employed by plant scientists.

Before 1980 the division of Agrobacterium largely reflected disease symptomology and host range. A. radiobacter is defined as the "avirulent" species, A. tumefaciens the one causing crown gall, A. rhizogenes causing hairy root disease, and A. rubi causing cane gall.

With the discovery of the Ti plasmid it was realized that symptomology mostly depend on the particular version of the plasmid carried, not anything that resembles a biological species concept. By 2000, the "biovar" concept, using growth and metabolic characteristics, had divided Agrobacterium into three biovars later shown to be mostly congruent with genetic differentiation. Biovar 1 would remain in Agrobacterium, biovar 2 to Rhizobium rhizogenes, and biovar 3 to Allorhizobium vitis. By 2014 there is very little, if any, confusion for what Agrobacterium in the strict sense would refer to.

However, another issue remains with the classification inside of biovar 1, specifically inside the Agrobacterium tumefaciens species complex, where biological species remain hard to differentiate without DNA sequencing. Researchers largely still stuck to the old nomenclature based on symptomology, save for a few who take the time to delimit the "genomovars" or "genomospecies" inside of this complex. To add to the confusion, the Approved Lists of 1980 changed the type strain of A. tumefaciens without explanation to "B6", a strain now properly classified as Agrobacterium radiobacter (genomovar 4), causing misled researchers to propose the synonymization of the two. The original type strain of A. tumefaciens, reinstated in 2023, belongs to genomovar 1.

Another strain of "A. tumefaciens" commonly used in early research was C58, which belongs to genomovar 8. For a review of the currently-known structure of the species complex, see Vargas Ribera et al. (2024), which also lists names that have been separately proposed for the genomovars.

This article cites a great number of sources that do not distinguish among the genomovars. Most text in this article should be treated as describing the species complex as a whole.

Sign in to keep reading

8 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Plants