Ahmad Sirhindi

Personal views

Modern writer Zahid Yahya al-Zariqi has likened Ahmad Sirhindi's personal views to Muhammad ibn Ali al-Sanusi, Ibn Taymiyya, Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab, Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, Abd al-Razzaq al-San'ani, and Al-Shawkani, due to his orthodox stance, and his opposition to emperor Akbar in terms of religious practice. Similarly, Aḥmad ʻArafāt Qāḍi from Cairo University also likened the thoughts of Ahmad Sirhindi to the views of Ibn Taymiyya. Salah Shu'air, an Egyptian writer, suggested Sirhindi's views were similar to the Wahhabism movement that arose two centuries after Ahmad Sirhindi's death, with both arguing for the resurrection and revival of religious discourse, which also influenced Shah Waliullah Dehlawi.

Ahmad Sirhindi repeatedly emphasised his proud ancestry to Rashidun caliph Umar ibn al-Khattab to show he was similarly in favour of orthodoxy. Abul Hasan Ali Hasani Nadwi, an Islamic scholar, thinker, writer, preacher, reformer and a Muslim public intellectual of 20th century India, wrote a biography of Ahmad Sirhindi in his book, Rijal al-Fikr wa l-Da'wah fi al-Islam, which mostly covers Ahmad Sirhindi's efforts to revive Islam and his opposition to Bid'ah (heresy). On another occasion, in a letter to Lãlã Beg (a Subahdar of Bihar), he described Akbar's prohibition of cow-slaughter as interference against the religious freedom of Muslims.

In particular, Ahmad Sirhindi believed that every ritualistic practice which is not documented in Sunnah, such as the annual prophet anniversary, was forbidden in Islam. He also criticized practices such as Sufi whirling (Raqs), the tradition of Sujud or prostrating towards the ruler, and other rituals which he deemed unislamic.

The societal reforms of the Mughal empire following Ahmad Sirhindi's methodology had several targets which he aimed to convey. He believed that to reform society, one must convey his thoughts to the following six types of people, in various societal positions:

1. The non-governmental influential class
2. Members of the imperial courts
3. The king
4. Scholars
5. Heretics and ignorant Sufis
6. Liberal scholars

At the same time, Ahmad Sirhindi personally accepted the use of Ijtihad and Qiyas in Fiqh and defended the use of both. Ahmad Sirhindi argued that Qiyas and Itjihad are not Bidʻah (heresy).

Regarding Hindu practice, Ahmad Sirhindi condemned the idea put forward by some Hindu thinkers, such as Hardai Ram, that the Bhakti movement was identical with Islamic mysticism.

Philosophy

Ahmad Sirhindi's opposition to emperor Akbar regarding Din-i Ilahi's syncretic belief were recorded in fourth volume of Tarikh-e-Dawat-o-Azeemat. Ahmad Sirhindi also rejected the ideas of philosophy, particularly those rooted from Greek philosophy. Furthermore, Sirhindi criticize the method of interpretating the meaning of Quran with philosophy.

Ahmad Sirhindi view regarding some of teachings found in Ibn Arabi's teaching in Waḥdat al-Wujūd. He argued that the doctrine of Ibn Arabi is incompatible with Islam. In his book, Ahmad Sirhindi criticized the doctrine of Waḥdat al-Wujūd, by saying in his book, Al-Muntakhabaat Min Al-Maktubaat, that God is never united with anything, and nothing can be united with God. Ahmad Sirhindi argued that forms of pantheism were components of Hinduism. He rejected the core idea of Ibn Arabi that the creation could unite with the Creator, i.e., God.

Despite this, Sirhindi still used Ibn al-'Arabi's vocabulary without hesitation. William C. Chittick, an expert of Ibn 'Arabi biography, argued that Ahmad Sirhindi seems oblivious of Ibn 'Arabi doctrines, as the Imam insisted that Wahdat al-Wujud were "inadequate expression" which should be supplanted by his concept of Wahdat ash-Shuhud which Chittick claimed is just similar in essence. Ahmad Sirhindi advanced the notion of Wahdat ash-Shuhūd (oneness of appearance). According to this doctrine, the experience of unity between God and creation is purely subjective and occurs only in the mind of the Sufi who has reached the state of fana' fi Allah (to forget about everything except Almighty Allah). Sirhindi considered Wahdat ash-Shuhūd to be superior to Wahdat al-Wujūd (oneness of being), which he understood to be a preliminary step on the way to the Absolute Truth.

Aside from the doctrine of pantheism of Ibn 'Arabi, Ahmad Sirhindi also expressed his opposition towards the idea of Metempsychosis or the migration of soul from one body to another.

Shia

Sirhindi also wrote a treatise under the title "Radd-e-Rawafiz" to justify the execution of Shia nobles by Abdullah Khan Uzbek in Mashhad. Ahmad Sirhindi argues that since the Shiite were cursing the first three Rashidun caliphs; Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman, and also chastising the Wives of Muhammad, he advocated for the oppression towards Shiite and supported the destruction of their buildings and confiscating their properties. Ahmad Sirhindi also expressed his hate towards Shias in his letters, where according to him, the worst distorters of faith "are those who bear malice against the companions of Prophet Muhammad. God has called them Kafirs in the Quran." In a letter to his discple Sheikh Farid, the Mir Bakhshi of the Mughal Empire, he said that showing respect to the distorters of faith (Ahl-e-Bidʻah) amounted to destruction of Islam. Ahmad Sirhindi believed the Shia, Mahdawi, and the mystics were responsible for the decline of Sunni Muslim unity in India.

Sikh

Ahmad Sirhindi recorded his hostility towards the Sikhs. In his Makutbat letter 193, he is said to have stated [sic]:

"The execution of the accused Kafir of Goindwal at this time is a very good achievement indeed and has become the cause of a great defeat of hateful Hindus. With whatever intention they are killed and with whatever objective they are destroyed it is a meritorious act for the Muslims. Before this Kafir was killed, I have seen a dream that Emperor of the day had destroyed the crown of the head of Shirk or infidelity. It is true that this infidel was the chief of the infidels and a leader of the Kafirs. The object of levying Jazia on them is to humiliate and insult the Kafirs and Jehad against them and hostility towards them are the necessities of the Muhammedan faith."

— Ahmad Sirhindi, No. 193 in Part III of Vol. I of Muktubat-i-Imam Rubbani Hazrat Mujaddid-i-Alf-i-Sani

As a hard-line supporter of Islamic orthodoxy and a highly influential religious revivalist, Ahmad Sirhindi had opposed Akbar's policy of religious tolerance. He had concerns about the spread of Sikhism in Punjab. So, he cheered on the murder of the Guru, thus giving it a religious rather than political colour.

Sufi

One of the biggest criticism of Ahmad Sirhindi towards the ritual and practice of his contemporary Sufi community was their neglection of Sharia, since he viewed those who followed Sufi Tariqa viewed that Sharia is not enough for pursuing Ma'rifa. Ahmad Sirhindi even goes so far that in his book he branded such kind of Sufi who abandon Sharia as apostates.

Ahmad Sirhindi's teaching emphasized the inter-dependence of both the Sufi path and Sharia, stating that "what is outside the path shown by the prophet is forbidden." In his criticism of the superficial jurists, he states: "For a worm hidden under a rock, the sky is the bottom of the rock." Meanwhile, Muhammad ibn Ahmad Hamid ad-Din al Farghani ad-Dimasyqi al-Hanafi, a Hanafite scholar who lived during 9th AH, recorded in his book, Jihad Ulama al-Hanafiyat fi 'Ibthal 'Aqaa'id al-Quburiyya, that Ahmad Sirhindi were one of Hanafite Imam who opposed the practice of Quburiyyun among Sufist.

According to Simon Digby, "modern hagiographical literature emphasizing Ahmad Sirhindi effort for strict Islamic orthodoxy, Sharia and religious observance." modern scholar Yohanan Friedmann also noted about the commitment of Ahmad Sirhindi in exhotation about Sharia or practical observance Islam remains extreme, despite his huge focus on the discourse about Sufi experience. However, Friedman in his other works claims Ahmad Sirhindi was primarily focusing on towards discourse of Sufism in mysticism instead.

Ahmad Sirhindi had originally declared the "reality of the Quran" (haqiqat-i quran) and "the reality of the Kaaba" (haqiqat-i ka'ba-yi rabbani) to be above the reality of Muhammad (haqiqat-i Muhammadi). This notion were deemed controversial by his contemporary, as it caused furor and opposition among certain Sufi followers and Ulama in Hejaz. Sirhindi responded to their criticism by stating that while the reality of Muhammad is superior to any creature, he is not meant to be worshipped through Sujud or prostrations, in contrast with Kaaba, which God commanded to be the direction of prostration or Qibla.

Legacy

The shrine of Ahmad Sirhindi, known as Rauza Sharif, is located in Sirhind, Punjab, India.

Ahmet Özel from Atatürk University has reported in his work on Diyanet İslâm Ansiklopedisi, el-Alemgiriyye, that some of Ahmad Sirhindi works were compiled in Fatawa 'Alamgiri.

Islamic orthodoxy

There are at least 60 kind of Maktubat (letters) recorded from Ahmad Sirhindi which he delivered to various notables, officials, and shaykhs during his life.

Due to his fervent orthodoxy, Ahmad Sirhindi's followers bestowed him the title of Mujaddid. For his role to the medieval southeast Asia Islamic community, the Islamic politician Muhammad Iqbal called Ahmad Sirhindi as "the Guardian of the wherewithal the Community". During 16th century, a Pantheism religious movements of Wahdat al wajood that are championed by Dara Shikoh, Sarmad Kashani, and Bawa Lal Dayal. However, these movement were opposed by Ahmad Sirhindi, Khwaja Muhammad Masum and Ghulam Yahya. Ahmad Sirhindi was noted as being influential here as his release of strong criticism of Ibn Arabi pantheism caused the movement received significant setbacks.

According to Mohammad Yasin in his work, A Social History of Islamic India, the impact of Ahmad Sirhindi in Muslim community in 17th century for reversing the spread of heterodox thinking was seen as huge success. Yohanan Friedmann has noted that according to many modern historians and thinkers, the puritanical thought of Ahmad Sirhindi has inspired the religious orthodoxy of emperor Aurangzeb. This was noted by how Ahmad Sirhindi managed to influence the successor of emperor Akbar, starting from Jahangir, into reversing Akbar's policies, such as lifting marriage age limits, mosque abolishments, and Hijra methodology revival which was abandoned by his father. It is noted by historians that this influence has been significantly recorded during the conquest of Kangra under Jahangir, that at the presence of Ahmad Sirhindi who observed the campaign, the Mughal forces had the Idols broken, a cow slaughtered, Khutbah sermon read, and other Islamic rituals performed. Further mark of Jahangir's departure from Akbar's secular policy was recorded by Terry, a traveller, who came and observed the Indian region between 1616 and 1619, where he found the mosques full of worshippers, the exaltation of Quran and Hadith practical teaching, and the complete observance of Fasting during Ramadan and Eid al-Fitr celebrations.

Gerardus Willebrordus Joannes Drewes argues that the influences of Ahmad Sirhindi idea of Islamic reformation and anti Ibn Arabi's pantheism has spread as far as Aceh, with the indication of how Aceh Sultanate scholar Nuruddin ar-Raniri seems held the similar view with Ahmad Sirhindi regarding he rejection against Ibn Arabi.

His letters (Maktubat) also circulated and was translated into Turkish by a historian and dervish named Müstakimzade Sa'deddin Efendi (d. 1788). His influence was also noted to have reached the Naqshbandis of the Ottoman Empire, as the order, adhering the view of Ahmad Sirhindi, completely reject Ibn Arabi's Wahdat al-Wujd doctrine in the early 18th century.

Abul A'la Maududi, modern Hanafite thinker and political activist, were recorded to quote Ahmad Sirhindi role in opposing the "religious impurities" which were introduced by Akbar earlier:

According to Chanfi Ahmed, many historians regards Ahmad Sirhindi as the pioneer of Islamic reformism of Salafism in seventeenth century India. Although Chanfi Ahmed regards the movement were marked by Shah Waliullah Dehlawi instead. Gamal al-Banna instead opined that Ahmad Sirhindi was influencing Shah Waliullah Dehlawi in reviving the science of Hadith in northern India.

In field of Hadith scholarships, Ahmad Sirhindi also wrote commentary or sharh of Sahih al-Tirmidhi.

Naqshbandi Sufism

By the latter part of the nineteenth century, the consensus of the Naqshbandi community had placed the prophetic realities closer to God than the divine realities. The rationale for this development may have been to neutralize unnecessary discord with the large Muslim community whose emotional attachment to Muhammad was greater than any understanding of philosophical fine points.

Ahmad Sirhindi criticize the practice of Khalwa or ascetism by calling it as heresy, due to no arguments that showed that the early generations of Muslims practiced it.

Naqshbandi Sufis claim that Ahmad Sirhindi is descended from a long line of "spiritual masters" which were claimed by the order:

1. Muhammad, d. 11 AH, buried in Medina, Saudi Arabia (570/571–632 CE)
2. Abu Bakar Siddique, d. 13 AH, buried in Medina, Saudi Arabia
3. Salman al-Farsi, d. 35 AH, buried in Madaa'in, Saudi Arabia
4. Qasim ibn Muhammad ibn Abi Bakr, d. 107 AH, buried in Medina, Saudi Arabia.
5. Jafar Sadiq, d. 148 AH, buried in Medina, Saudi Arabia.
6. Bayazid Bastami, d. 261 AH, buried in Bastaam, Iran (804 - 874 CE).
7. Abu al-Hassan al-Kharaqani, d. 425 AH, buried Kharqaan, Iran.
8. Abul Qasim Gurgani, d. 450 AH, buried in Gurgan, Iran.
9. Abu ali Farmadi, d. 477 AH, buried in Tous, Khorasan, Iran.
10. Abu Yaqub Yusuf Hamadani, d. 535 AH, buried in Maru, Khorosan, Iran.
11. Abdul Khaliq Ghujdawani, d. 575 AH, buried in Ghajdawan, Bukhara, Uzbekistan.
12. Arif Riwgari, d. 616 AH, buried in Reogar, Bukhara, Uzbekistan.
13. Mahmood Anjir-Faghnawi, d. 715 AH, buried in Waabakni, Mawarannahr, Uzbekistan.
14. Azizan Ali Ramitani, d. 715 AH, buried in Khwarezm, Bukhara, Uzbekistan.
15. Mohammad Baba As-Samasi, d. 755 AH, buried in Samaas, Bukhara, Uzbekistan.
16. Amir Kulal, d. 772 AH, buried in Saukhaar, Bukhara, Uzbekistan.
17. Baha-ud-Din Naqshband Bukhari, d. 791 AH, buried in Qasr-e-Aarifan, Bukhara, Uzbekistan (1318–1389 CE).
18. Sayyid Alauddin Atar Bukhari, buried in Jafaaniyan, Mawranahar, Uzbekistan.
19. Yaqub al-Charkhi, d. 851 AH, buried in Tajikistan
20. Khwaja Ahrar, d. 895 AH, buried in Samarkand, Uzbekistan.
21. Muhammad Zahid Wakhshi, d. 936 AH, buried in Wakhsh, Malk Hasaar, Tajikistan
22. Darwish Muhammad, d. 970 AH, buried in Samarkand, Uzbekistan
23. Muhammad Amkanagi, d. 1008 AH, buried in Akang, Bukhara, Uzbekistan
24. Khwaja Baqi Billah, d. 1012 AH, buried in Delhi, India
25. Ahmad al-Farūqī al-Sirhindī (Ahmad Sirhindi, subject of this article)