Lably
Skip to content

Explore on Lably

ToursExplore Lably’s 3D tours

Name and character

Alammuš’s name was often written logographically as dLÀL (𒀭𒋭) or dMÙŠ.LÀL, though syllabic spellings are attested too. The Sumerian logogram LÀL resembles that representing the unrelated deity Kabta, leading to occasional confusion between them in scholarship in the past. Frans Wiggermann notes that the name and character of Alammuš (as well as these of other well attested sukkals of major city gods: Ninshubur, Nuska, Bunene and Isimud) do not appear to show direct connection with these of his master, Nanna, which means that he cannot be considered the personification of the effect of the corresponding major deity's actions (unlike sukkals such Nabium, deified flame associated with Girra or Nimgir, deified lightning associated with Ishkur) or a divine personifications of specific commands (unlike such deities as Eturammi, "do not slacken," the sukkal of Birtum). It has been proposed that he was a god connected with food production, as the logogram LÀL used to write his name also meant "honey" or "syrup," and in an offering list from Umma he appears alongside deities associated with grain (Nisaba) and dairy (Nineigara, the wife of Ningublaga, whose name means "lady of the house of butter and cream").

Alammuš could be addressed as a sukkalmaḫ. This term originally denoted an administrative official responsible for managing the duties of sukkals, in this context a class of lower ranked officials responsible for overseeing the implementation of royal orders rather than a type of deity. However, there is no evidence that a divine sukkalmaḫ was in charge of deities regarded as sukkals, and in some cases a deity had multiple sukkals but none of them was referred as a sukkalmaḫ, while in other a sukkalmaḫ was the only sukkal of their master. Most likely addressing a deity as a sukkalmaḫ was only meant to highlight the high position of their master in the pantheon. A text written in the Emesal dialect of Sumerian calls Alammuš "the noble lord of the courtyard," possibly a synonym of his usual title.

Frans Simons instead argues that Alammuš was a god associated with the underworld, pointing at his position in a list deities on the so-called "Land grant to Munnabittu kudurru," where he and Ningublaga occur between the members of two well established groups of underworld deities, Nergal and his entourage and the snake gods Tishpak and Ištaran. He is uncertain if Alammuš and his twin should be regarded as members of one of these two groups, or as unrelated to either despite their postulated character. He also argues that since disappearance of the moon could be connected with the underworld and with funerary offerings, it would be reasonable to assume that some of the courtiers of the moon god would show affinity with this sphere.

The attribute of Alammuš was a staff, which most likely was used to identify sukkals in visual arts.

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Religion and spirituality