Lably
Skip to content

Analyticity of holomorphic functions

Theorem in complex analysis

  • 3 min read
  • 2 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Complex number, Function (mathematics) and Differentiable function

One of the most important theorems of complex analysis is that holomorphic functions are analytic and vice versa. (A holomorphic function at a point is analytic at the point and vice versa.) Among the corollaries of this theorem are

  • the identity theorem that two holomorphic functions that agree at every point of an infinite set S with an accumulation point inside the intersection of their domains also agree everywhere in every connected open subset of their domains that contains the set S, and
  • the fact that, since power series are infinitely differentiable, so are holomorphic functions (this is in contrast to the case of real differentiable functions), and
  • the fact that the radius of convergence is always the distance from the center a to the nearest non-removable singularity; if there are no singularities (i.e., if f is an entire function), then the radius of convergence is infinite. Strictly speaking, this is not a corollary of the theorem but rather a by-product of the proof.
  • no bump function supported in a non-empty compact subset of the complex plane can be entire. In particular, on any connected open subset of the complex plane, there can be no bump function defined on that set which is holomorphic on the set. This has important ramifications for the study of complex manifolds, as it precludes the use of partitions of unity. In contrast the partition of unity is a tool which can be used on any real manifold.

Proof

The argument, first given by Cauchy, hinges on Cauchy's integral formula and the power series expansion of the expression

1w−z.

Let D be an open disk centered at a and suppose f is differentiable everywhere within an open neighborhood containing the closure of D. Let C be the positively oriented (i.e., counterclockwise) circle which is the boundary of D and let z be a point in D. Starting with Cauchy's integral formula, we have

f(z)=12πi∫Cf(w)w−zdw=12πi∫Cf(w)(w−a)−(z−a)dw=12πi∫C1w−a⋅11−z−aw−af(w)dw=12πi∫C1w−a⋅∑n=0∞(z−aw−a)nf(w)dw=∑n=0∞12πi∫C(z−a)n(w−a)n+1f(w)dw.

Interchange of the integral and infinite sum is justified by observing that f(w)/(w−a) is bounded on C by some positive number M, while for all w in C

|z−aw−a|≤q<1

for some positive q as well. We therefore have

|(z−a)n(w−a)n+1f(w)|≤Mqn,

on C, and as the Weierstrass M-test shows the series converges uniformly over C, the sum and the integral may be interchanged.

As the factor (z−a)n does not depend on the variable of integration w, it may be factored out to yield

f(z)=∑n=0∞(z−a)n12πi∫Cf(w)(w−a)n+1dw,

which has the desired form of a power series in z:

f(z)=∑n=0∞cn(z−a)n

with coefficients

cn=12πi∫Cf(w)(w−a)n+1dw.

Sign in to keep reading

One more chapter is free with a Lably account.

More in Topics in mathematics