Lably
Skip to content

Bone conduction

Conduction of sound to the inner ear

  • 11 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Sound and Ludwig van Beethoven

Bone conduction is also called the second auditory pathway, not to be confused with cartilage conduction, which is considered the third auditory pathway.

Overview

Bone conduction is one reason why a person's voice sounds different to them when it is recorded and played back. Because the skull conducts lower frequencies better than air, people perceive their own voices to be lower and fuller than others do, and a recording of one's own voice frequently sounds higher than one expects (see voice confrontation).

Some commercial headsets use bone conduction combined with real-time filtering to modify a user's perception of their own voice (e.g., Forbrain).

Musicians may use bone conduction using a tuning fork while tuning stringed instruments. After the fork starts vibrating, placing it in the mouth with the stem between the back teeth ensures that one continues to hear the note via bone conduction, and both hands are free to do the tuning. Ludwig van Beethoven was famously rumored to be using bone conduction after losing most of his hearing, by placing one end of a rod in his mouth and resting the other end on the rim of his piano.

It has also been observed that some animals can perceive sound and even communicate by sending and receiving vibration through bone.

Comparison of hearing sensitivity through bone conduction and directly through the ear canal can aid audiologists in identifying pathologies of the middle ear—the area between the tympanic membrane (ear drum) and the cochlea (inner ear). If hearing is markedly better through bone conduction than through the ear canal (air-bone gap), problems with the ear canal (e.g. ear wax accumulation), the tympanic membrane or ossicles can be suspected. This method was first discovered by Italian physician Hieronymus Capivacci.

Research has investigated the acoustic properties of the skull in children with specific language disorders and how these properties may influence hearing. In one study, broadband noise was analyzed using both controlled audiology-room testing and a custom helmet fitted with multiple bone microphones positioned over cranial gaps, with spectral analysis performed using Fast Fourier Transform and one-third-octave bands. Energetic peaks were observed around 63 and 125 Hz, primarily on the left side of the skull, and individual skull acoustic patterns were found to correlate with bone-conduction thresholds but not with air-conduction thresholds, suggesting a mediating role of skull acoustics in hearing.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Health