Lably
Skip to content

Carbon storage in the North Sea

Storage of carbon dioxide in the North Sea

  • 12 min read
  • 5 chapters

Related on Lably

Through United Nations, Seawater and European Union

The first carbon storage operation to utilise the North Sea bed, was the Sleipner Field in 1996, which was operated by a Norwegian oil and gas company. However, the storage of carbon was down to the gas product having a high carbon content, and so needed to be scrubbed (stripped) of its carbon, which was pumped back down into the gas well.

Background

Gas and oil were first discovered in the North Sea off the coast of The Netherlands in 1959. This led to a huge oil and gas industry, and whilst the industry peaked around the year 2000, it is projected that gas and oil could be successfully recovered from the North Sea until the 2050s. A 1958 law enacted by the United Nations (United Nations Convention on the Continental Shelf), and a later law from 1982 (United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea [UNCLOS]), afforded nations certain rights for the use of the seabed on the continental shelf, but also, the responsibilities that a country should adhere to. So, whilst installing oil and gas rigs was allowed, the rigs and pipelines are sometimes required to be removed when the drilling was finished to avoid interfering with shipping and fishing. This is of paramount importance off the coast of The Netherlands where the coastal waters are very shallow, but for Norway and the UK, decisions could be taken on a case-by-case basis, thereby affording the opportunity of re-using the infrastructure for CO2 storage.

The previous use of drilling for oil and gas, and the plentiful availability of the saline aquifers on the sea bed, means that Norway and the United Kingdom share 90% of the identified locations that are geologically stable enough to store carbon dioxide under pressure. The chief executive of Storegga, a company behind a scheme to store carbon working from Scotland stated that "..While I don’t doubt there will be other stores found in Europe over time . . . they will still be dwarfed by the North Sea."

Although carbon storage is deemed by most scientists as an essential element to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, the cost of removal of the CO2, the transportation and then the eventual storage of the gas, is quite prohibitive, and as countries have pledged a net zero economy by 2050, efforts have been concentrated on the technologies to deal either with the carbon produced, or to remove it entirely. In April 2021, the commercial removal, transportation and storage of CO2 was rated at $600 per tonne, but this was expected to be reduced to between $200 and $300 by the late 2020s. Despite the necessity to achieve carbon-zero programmes, there has been public opposition to storing carbon onshore, and the North Sea offers the largest offshore storage capacity in Europe.

Whilst studies have developed the prospect of storing CO2 in the depths of the sea, where the pressure will keep it submerged, the preferred method is for storage in old oil and gas wells. When CO2 mixes with seawater, the imbalance may harm marine life, and would lead to a "measurable change in ocean chemistry".

The first commercial storage of CO2 in the North Sea (and in the world) was enacted in 1996 at the Sleipner gas field, though the carbon was removed from the gas on-site (ie, at sea) and pumped into a saline aquifer due to commercial reasons. However, the monitoring of the storage site, and the data acquired over the years provides a useful benchmark for other projects to learn from. A study conducted on the Sleipner storage reservoir in 2003, when it had been in operation for seven years, determined that the CO2 would not "migrate into the North Sea for 100,000 years. Others have stated that whilst seepage from storage reservoirs may be inevitable, the loss rate will be negligible and the environmental impact of not storing CO2 would be worse. Similarly, a study conducted in the Forties Oil Field, determined that over a 1,000 year period, 0,2% of the CO2 would leach out of the storage facility and move upwards. Even so, the maximum distance it would move would be only half the distance to the seabed level. However, some existing oil and gas wells were leaking methane into the sea. A study in 2012/2013, determined that of 43 wells observed in the North Sea, 28 were leaching methane, the second most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide. Methane in the sea water leads to acidification of the water.

The ability to re-use depleted oil and gas wells, or saline aquifers, and the ability to back flow carbon dioxide through redundant pipelines, means a cost-saving benefit. A study conducted by University of Edinburgh on the Beatrice Oilfield off the coast of Scotland, determined that decommissioning the oil platform would cost £260 million, but re-purposing the platform to accept captured CO2 over a thirty-year period, would cost only £26 million. One scheme slated to be worked from the St Fergus Gas Terminal in Scotland, would save £730 million by pumping the CO2 back through the redundant pipelines, saving on investment in transportation. Some of the UK schemes are looking beyond their domestic markets in terms of CO2 storage, and will lobby to store the gas on behalf of other nations. One storage site investigated lies 1.6-kilometre (1 mi) down, under the Moray Firth off the east coast of Scotland. The depleted reservoir lies underneath the Captain Sandstone Formation, and if CO2 was injected from two points simultaneously, the reservoir has the capacity to store 360,000,000 tonnes (400,000,000 tons) in just 1/6 of its area. This is the amount of CO2 emitted by Scotland over 23 years.

In 2009, the European Union issued a directive governing carbon capture and storage, stating that sites for storage need to be secure against harm to human health, and that operators must have the financial backing to see the project through, should problems occur. Companies (and Member States) that store CO2 under the conditions of the directive, are free to designate the CO2 as not having been "emitted" under the Emission Trading Scheme.

Enhanced oil recovery

Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) involves injecting CO2 into oil fields to force remaining oil and residues out of the field. This can extend the life of the oilfield in addition to storing the CO2, provided the geology is stable enough to do so. The technology for this has been proven onshore, but offshore workings are still under evaluation. Two projects in the North Sea were initiated in 1998 and in 2002, one which involved injected liquid methane into an oil well. The success of the two ventures led to increased confidence in the use of EOR offshore. A further venture at the Forties Oil Field has been suggested, which would store the CO2 and make the oil recovery easier, although not economically viable.

Sign in to keep reading

4 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Earth science