Carbon suboxide

Polymerization

Carbon suboxide polymerizes spontaneously to a red, yellow, or black solid. The structure is postulated to be poly(α-pyronic), similar to the structure in 2-pyrone (α-pyrone). The number of monomers in the polymers is variable (see Oxocarbon#Polymeric carbon oxides). In 1969, it was hypothesized that the color of the Martian surface was caused by this compound; this was disproved by the Viking Mars probes (the red color is instead due to iron oxide).

Uses

Carbon suboxide is used in the preparation of malonates; and as an auxiliary to improve the dye affinity of furs.

In chemical synthesis, carbon suboxide is a 1,3-dipole, reacting with alkenes to make 1,3‑cyclopentadiones. Because it is so unstable, it is a reagent of last resort.

Biological role

Carbon suboxide, C₃O₂, can be produced in small amounts in any biochemical process that normally produces carbon monoxide, CO, for example, during heme oxidation by heme oxygenase-1. It can also be formed from malonic acid. It has been shown that carbon suboxide in an organism can quickly polymerize into macrocyclic polycarbon structures with the common formula (C₃O₂)_n (mostly (C₃O₂)₆ and (C₃O₂)₈), and that those macrocyclic compounds are potent inhibitors of Na⁺/K⁺-ATP-ase and Ca-dependent ATP-ase, and have digoxin-like physiological properties and natriuretic and antihypertensive actions. Those macrocyclic carbon suboxide polymer compounds are thought to be endogenous digoxin-like regulators of Na⁺/K⁺-ATP-ases and Ca-dependent ATP-ases, and endogenous natriuretics and antihypertensives. Other than that, some authors think also that those macrocyclic compounds of carbon suboxide can possibly diminish free radical formation and oxidative stress and play a role in endogenous anticancer protective mechanisms, for example in the retina.

Structure and bonding

The structure of carbon suboxide has been the subject of experiments and computations since the 1970s. The central issue is the question of whether the molecule is linear or bent (i.e., whether ${\displaystyle \theta {}_{{\text{C}}_2^{}}{}^{}=\mathrm{\angle }{\text{C}}_1^{}{\text{C}}_2^{}{\text{C}}_3^{}\stackrel{?}{=}180{}^{\circ }}$). Studies generally agree that the molecule is highly non-rigid, with a very shallow barrier to bending. According to one study, the molecular geometry is described by a double-well potential with a minimum at θ_C2 ~ 160°, an inversion barrier of 20 cm⁻¹ (0.057 kcal/mol), and a total energy change of 80 cm⁻¹ (0.23 kcal/mol) for 140° ≤ θ_C2 ≤ 180°. The small energetic barrier to bending is around the same order of magnitude as the vibrational zero-point energy. Therefore, the molecule is best described as quasilinear. While infrared and electron diffraction studies have indicated that C₃O₂ has a bent structure in the gas phase, the compound was found to possess at least an average linear geometry in the solid phase by X-ray crystallography, although the large thermal ellipsoids of the oxygen atoms and C₂ have been interpreted to be consistent with rapid bending (minimum θ_C2 ~ 170°), even in the solid state.

A heterocumulene resonance form of carbon suboxide based on minimization of formal charges does not readily explain the molecule's non-rigidity and deviation from linearity. To account for the quasilinear structure of carbon suboxide, Frenking has proposed that carbon suboxide be regarded as a "coordination complex" of carbon(0) bearing two carbonyl ligands and two lone pairs: $\text{OC}:⟶\stackrel{\cdot \cdot }{\underset{\cdot \cdot }{\text{C}}}⟵<!--\; -->:\text{CO}$. However, the contribution of dative bonding in C₃O₂ and similar species has been criticized as chemically unreasonable by others.