Lably
Skip to content

Corruption in Lebanon

  • 5 min read
  • 6 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Separation of powers

History

Transparency International's 2025 Corruption Perceptions Index, which scored 182 countries on a scale from 0 ("highly corrupt") to 100 ("very clean"), gave Lebanon a score of 23. Lebanon's scores of 22 and 23 in 2024 and 2025 were its lowest scores since the current version of the Index was introduced in 2012. When ranked by score in 2025, Lebanon ranked 153rd among the 182 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with regional scores, the best score among Middle Eastern and North African countries was 69, the average was 39 and the worst was 13. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 89 (ranked 1), the average was 42, and the worst was 9 (ranked 181 in a two-way tie).

According to Charles Adwan, Director of the Lebanese Transparency Association, "the extension of wartime elites into the post-war political system, a common feature in post-conflict countries, resulted in a system which removed all checks and balances and facilitated the diversion of state resources for private financial and political gain". Government officials reportedly often award contracts to friends and family, leading to many of the country's problems, like daily power cuts. Many working-class Lebanese citizens rely on economic assistance from their party, which stops them from speaking up against the system or bringing them to justice, despite widespread opposition. Lebanon's government works within the framework of confessionalism, with parliamentary seats and other government positions allocated by religious confession. Many members of government have been in power since the Lebanese Civil War, with mere shuffling of positions every election cycle. Many blame this system for the country's continued corruption.

Corruption happens on every level of society and is not strictly limited to high-level officials. As in many neighboring countries, using what is locally known as wasta or personal family and party connections to get favors like skipping a long queue, getting into a selective institution, or finding a job is common practice and has become the social norm. Although many believe that using wasta is understandable for each individual case, as institutions are often inefficient without it, it is also agreed upon that the social phenomenon deepens economic inequality.

Sign in to keep reading

5 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Economics