Lably
Skip to content

Cryo-electron microscopy

Electron microscopy technique

  • 11 min read
  • 4 chapters
Titan Krios Cryo-EM at University of Leeds
Hiramano92 · CC BY-SA 4.0

Related on Lably

Through Kelvin, Nature (journal) and Covalent bond

When scanning a biological specimen, the sample structure is preserved by embedding the specimen in vitreous ice. An aqueous sample solution is applied to a grid mesh and plunge-frozen in either liquid ethane or a mixture of liquid ethane and propane.

The 2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Jacques Dubochet, Joachim Frank, and Richard Henderson "for developing cryo-electron microscopy for the high-resolution structure determination of biomolecules in solution." Nature Methods also named cryo-EM as the "Method of the Year" in 2015.

History

Early development

In the 1960s, transmission electron microscopy of biological samples was limited because of radiation damage from the high-energy electron beams. Scientists hypothesized that examining specimens at low temperatures would reduce beam-induced radiation damage. Both liquid helium (−269 °C or 4 K or −452 °F) and liquid nitrogen (−195.79 °C or 77 K or −320 °F) were considered as cryogens, though high stability was never achieved. In 1980, Erwin Knapek and Jacques Dubochet published comments on beam damage at cryogenic temperatures sharing observations that:

Thin crystals mounted on carbon film were found to be from 30 to 300 times more beam-resistant at 4 K than at room temperature... Most of our results can be explained by assuming that cryoprotection in the region of 4 K is strongly dependent on the temperature.

However, these results were not reproduced. Amendments were published two years later along with a commentary in Nature, indicating that beam resistance was less significant than anticipated. The protection gained at 4 K was closer to "tenfold for standard samples of L-valine" than what was previously stated. While cryo-EM samples are routinely collected at liquid nitrogen temperatures, work has continued to understand sample behavior at liquid helium temperatures.

In 1981, scientists at the European Molecular Biology Laboratory reported the first successful cryo-EM. Researchers sprayed pure water onto a hydrophilic carbon film that was rapidly plunged into a cryogen (liquid propane or liquid ethane cooled to 77 K). The thin layer of amorphous ice formed on the film was less than 1 μm thick, and an electron diffraction pattern confirmed the presence of amorphous/vitreous ice. In 1984, the group demonstrated the power of cryo-EM in structural biology by analysing vitrified adenovirus type 2, T4 bacteriophage, Semliki Forest virus, Bacteriophage CbK, and vesicular stomatitis virus. The paper marked the origin of cryo-EM, and the technique has since become routine in laboratories throughout the world.

The energy of the electrons used for imaging (80–300 kV) can break covalent bonds in organic and biological samples. Imaging biological specimens requires minimising electron exposure. Low exposures require images of thousands or millions of frozen molecules to be selected, aligned, and averaged to obtain high-resolution maps using specialized software. The 2012 introduction of direct electron detectors and better computational algorithms significantly improved structural features.

Recent advancements

The 2010s saw drastic advancements in electron cameras, including to direct electron detectors, causing a "resolution revolution" pushing the resolution barrier beneath the crucial ~2-3 Å limit to resolve amino acid position and orientation.

Direct electron detectors and more powerful imaging algorithms allow macromolecular structures to be determined at near-atomic resolution. Imaged macromolecules include viruses, ribosomes, mitochondria, ion channels, and enzyme complexes. Starting in 2018, cryo-EM could be applied to structures as small as hemoglobin (64 kDa) with resolutions up to 1.8 Å. In 2019, cryo-EM structures grew to 2.5% of structures deposited in the Protein Data Bank. Cryo-EM can be used for cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET), creating 3D reconstructions of samples from tilted 2D images.

Richard Henderson of the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology at Cambridge formed a consortium with engineers at the Rutherford Appleton Laboratory and scientists at the Max Planck Society to fund and develop a first prototype. The consortium then joined forces with electron microscope manufacturer FEI to roll out and market the new design. At about the same time, Gatan Inc. of Pleasanton, California, came out with a similar detector designed by Peter Denes of the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and David Agard of the University of California, San Francisco. A third type of camera was developed by Nguyen-Huu Xuong at the Direct Electron company in San Diego.

Recent advancements in protein-based imaging scaffolds assist with sample orientation bias and size limit. Though the minimum size for cryo-EM remains undetermined, proteins smaller than ~50 kDa generally have too low a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) to resolve protein particles, making 3D reconstruction difficult or impossible. Multiple techniques have been reported to improve SNR when determining the structures of small proteins. Based on high-affinity DARPins, nanobodies, and antibody fragments, these methods rigidly bind the target protein and thereby increase the effective particle size and introduce symmetry to improve SNR for cryo-EM map reconstruction. An advantage of cryo-EM over crystallization is that it requires much less sample material, making it easier to determine the structures of proteins that cannot be isolated with a high yield.

In recognition of the impact cryo-EM has had on biochemistry, Dubochet, Frank and Henderson were awarded the 2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry "for developing cryo-electron microscopy for the high-resolution structure determination of biomolecules in solution."

Sign in to keep reading

3 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Biology