Lably
Skip to content

Excitation-transfer theory

Psychological theory

  • 12 min read
  • 9 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Psychology, Biochemistry and Physiology

This theory, which applies elements of the three-factor theory of emotions, states that left over, or residual, excitation from the initial stimulus will amplify the excitatory response or reaction to another stimulus, regardless of the hedonic valences or potential experience one has had with the emotions felt from the stimuli. Hedonic valence, in particular, refers to the emotional tone or affective quality of an experience, stimulus, or object. In addition, the excitation-transfer process is not limited to a single emotion, as the initial, residual, and excitatory emotional reactions do not have to be related.

The process of excitation-transfer occurs when the feelings of arousal, or another emotion of excitation, that stem from one stimulus is converted, or misattributed, into a different action or behavior due to a secondary stimulus. In addition, the transfer of one emotion to another will result in the second emotion directed toward the additional stimulus being felt more intensely than if the emotion caused by the first stimulus was not felt. Components including dispositional and excitatory emotional responses related to the three-factor theory of emotions are also correlated to the excitation-transfer process.

Developed research and applied studies in which this theory has been tested has led to the development of specific conditions required for the excitation-transfer process to occur. These conditions include time, shift of attention and hedonic assimilation. Examples of how the theory is applied are also provided.

In addition, research has also found limitations of excitation-transfer theory, which are noted as areas requiring further research.

History

Dolf Zillmann began developing excitation-transfer theory in the late 1960s through the early 1970s and continued to refine it into the 21st century. The theory itself is based largely on Clark Hull's notion of residual excitation (i.e., drive theory), Stanley Schachter's two factor theory of emotion, and the application of the three-factor theory of emotions. Specifically, Zillmann noticed a fault within the two factor theory of emotion regarding the lack of information that addressed the relationship between cognitive behaviors and cues within the theory.

In these theories working as the starting point, excitation-transfer theory is able to make assumptions regarding how the transition of one emotion to another cognitively occurs. One of the assumptions states that excitation responses are, for the most part, ambiguous and are differentiated only by what emotions the brain assigns to them in that specific instance. This theory also helps to explain the variability of emotional arousal (including how it is possible for fear to be transferred into relief, anger into delight, etc.) and how the reaction to one stimulus can intensify the reaction to another.

During the development of excitation-transfer theory, the public became concerned about the potential real-world effects violent media content could have on consumers. As a result, excitation-transfer theory became one of the dominant theoretical foundations used for predicting, testing, and explaining the potential effects of media such as violent films, pornography, and music onto the population.

Furthermore, Zillmann also expressed that excitation transfer is not limited to face-to-face communication stimuli, as the process can occur from an array of stimuli including mediated messages. Research focusing on this theory has found a correlation between cognitive levels of arousal and behavioral actions as a result of the media being consumed.

Sign in to keep reading

8 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Psychology