Lably
Skip to content

For-profit higher education in the United States

  • 17 min read
  • 12 chapters

Related on Lably

Through Privatization, Target Corporation and Internet

History

For-profit colleges in the U.S. have their origins in the Colonial Era. According to AJ Angulo, 19th century for-profit colleges offering practical skills expanded across the United States, meeting a demand for practical job training. A student could take any courses, and they generally did not offer degrees or dormitories or extra-curricular activities. Typically they hired local businessmen to give occasional courses. In the 1830s and 1840s, proprietary business schools in Boston, Brooklyn, and Philadelphia offered penmanship and accounting classes. The expansion continued in the 1850s and 1860s, to Chicago, New Orleans, Memphis, and San Jose. Angulo estimated that there were 2,000 for-profit colleges with more than 240,000 students during the period, if fly-by-night schools were included. The Bryant & Stratton Chain School grew to about 50 schools by 1864. After graduating from high school in 1901 Harry S. Truman decided not to attend the state university like his friends. He was more interested in continuing his advanced piano lessons in Kansas City. He also took three occasional courses at Spalding's Commercial College, including typing, shorthand, and accounting. These proved useful in getting an office job with a major bank, and later when he kept the books on his family farm. The decline of proprietary colleges was a result of the Smith-Hughes Act of 1917, also known as the National Vocational Education Act, which funded free public vocational education.

In 1893, two years after International Correspondence Schools (ICS) started their profitable and increasingly popular business, others followed, including University of Chicago, Penn State College, and University of Wisconsin. Through several social movements and public funding, the US slowly became more inclusive and education became more universal. But some for-profit entities pushed the envelope with deceptive marketing and advertising promising more than they could deliver.

Since the early twentieth century critics have complained about money rather than academics driving leadership at traditional universities. Thorstein Veblen's 1918 famous screed on the topic, The Higher Learning in America, was subtitled, "A Memorandum on the Conduct of Universities by Business Men." While nonprofit university leaders have faced increasing pressures to grow funding and endowments, the lines separating nonprofit and for-profit institutions have been more strictly enforced in the U.S. than in nearly any other country, contributing to American dominance in higher education. In 1923, muckraker Upton Sinclair published The Goose Step: A Study of American Education, a 488-page account of monied interests at elite colleges and universities, which concluded that all of the institutions he researched were plutocratic. Sinclair reportedly interviewed 1000 people across the US and used a variety of primary and secondary sources, particularly from the American Association of University Professors. The Goose Step mentions a number of industrialists and entrepreneurs, including Andrew Carnegie (Carnegie Tech), John D. Rockefeller (University of Chicago), Johns Hopkins, J.P. Morgan (Columbia University), and Leland Stanford (Stanford University).

Growth of for-profit colleges (1945–2010)

In the 1940s, "fly-by-night commercial vocational 'schools' sprang up to collect veterans' tuition grants" due to the newly created GI Bill's lax requirements and limited oversight. For-profit colleges grew again from 1972 to 1976, after the Higher Education Act of 1965, part of President Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" of progressive reforms, was amended so that for-profit colleges could receive Pell Grants and federal student loans.

University of Phoenix was a pioneer as a for-profit mega-university, schools of over 80,000 students, with an emphasis on adult learners and a business attitude, and later with an emphasis on online learning. With profit-driven schools, academic labor was faced with unbundling, where "various components of the traditional faculty role (e.g., curriculum design) are divided among different entities, while others (e.g., research) are eliminated altogether."

From 1974 to 1986, for-profit colleges share of Pell Grants rose from 7 percent to 21 percent, even though for-profit colleges only enrolled 5 percent of all higher education students. In the 1980s, public higher education was also increasingly privatized. In the late 1980s, Secretary of Education William Bennett investigated the problems with for-profit higher education; investigators found widespread abuses across the industry.

Privatization, regulation, and deregulation (1980–present)

Since the 1980s, public universities, particularly state flagship universities have increasingly relied on for-profit revenue sources and privatization.

Regulations and policies to curb the abuses in for-profit higher education occurred during the presidency of Barack Obama. These actions were rolled back during the Donald Trump administration.

As for-profit colleges face declining enrollment, there has been a blurring between for-profit and non-profit institutions. For-profit Online Program Managers (OPMs) serving public and private non-profit schools include 2U, Academic Partnerships, Bisk Education, Noodle Partners, Pearson Education, and Wiley. In 2018, there were more than two dozen OPMs. Human capital contracts, also known as Income Share Agreements (ISAs) may also be seen as for-profit vehicles.

Sign in to keep reading

11 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Education