Lably
Skip to content

Iberian Crusades

Crusades against Muslim control of Iberia

  • 43 min read
  • 10 chapters

Explore on Lably

ToursExplore Lably’s 3D tours

As the Reconquista advanced, the taifa rulers sought aid from the fundamentalist Almoravids of North Africa, who halted the Christian expansion. Soon after proclaiming the First Crusade for the liberation of the Holy Land at the Council of Clermont in 1095, Pope Urban II extended the same spiritual privilege—remission of sins—to Iberian lords who took up arms against the Moors (Iberian Muslims). Peter I of Aragon was the first ruler, in 1100, to fulfil his crusading vow within the peninsula, and his example was soon followed by others. Leading crusading armies, Alfonso I of Aragon captured Zaragoza (1118), Afonso I of Portugal seized Lisbon (1147), and Ramon Berenguer IV of Barcelona took Tortosa (1148). The renewed Christian advance provoked another North African intervention, this time by the Almohads, who could only temporarily halt the Christian expansion. Occasionally, the Moors' Christian allies, such as Alfonso IX of León were also targeted by crusading campaigns. After crusader forces inflicted a decisive defeat on the Almohads at the Battle of Las Navas de Tolosa in 1212, the Reconquista gained new momentum. Papal grants of crusade indulgence then supported James I of Aragon in the conquest of Mallorca (1231) and Valencia (1238), and Ferdinand III of Castile in the capture of Córdoba (1236) and Seville (1248), reducing al-Andalus to the Emirate of Granada by 1262.

Terminology

As the historian Andrew Jotischky notes, before the close of the 11th century the Iberian Peninsula was "the only part of Latin Christendom to have undergone lasting conquest by the Islamic world". The idea of recovering lost Christian lands first appeared in 9th-century chronicles by clerics of the Kingdom of Asturias, a Christian enclave in north-western Iberia. Texts such as the Prophetic Chronicle and the Chronicle of Albelda were the first to articulate this ideology. Waging war to reclaim Christian territory provided a moral rationale for campaigns against Muslims, as Christianity condemned aggressive warfare. The gradual recovery of regions once under Christian rule became known as the Reconquista ("Reconquest"). Extending until 1492, it was, in the words of the medievalist Nikolas Jaspert, "not an ongoing war, but a succession of long periods of peace punctuated by shorter crises".

The historian Christopher Tyerman observes that "the Reconquest and crusading were not synonyms". Scholars defining crusades narrowly—as papally directed efforts to recover the Holy Land—exclude the papally endorsed wars of the Reconquista. Paul Rousset concedes their crusading aspects—papal backing, international participation, and anti-Muslim intent—while Hans Eberhard Mayer calls them "a substitute for a crusade". By contrast, historians identifying crusades through the granting of a specific spiritual privilege, the crusade indulgence, include papally sponsored Iberian wars within the broader crusading movement.

Early Christian sources, composed in Latin in the 9th century, drew on Genesis to describe Muslim foes, using Saraceni and Ismaelitae; the more neutral Mauri ("Mauritanians") became dominant from the 11th century, later evolving into moros in Spanish and "Moors" in English. Muslim writers described Iberian Christians with various terms—some neutral, such as al-Ishbān ("Hispanians") and naṣrānī ("Nazarenes")—others disparaging, including kāfir ("infidel"), and mushrik ("polytheist"). Christians under Muslim rule are known as Mozarabs (from Arabic al-musta'rab, "Arabised"), while Muslims remaining in Christian-held lands are termed Mudejars (from al-mudajjan, "domesticated").

Sign in to keep reading

9 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Post-classical