Maximally informative dimensions
- 2 min read
- 2 chapters
Related on Lably
Through Statistics, Linearity and Neuron
Mathematical formulation
Neural stimulus-response functions are typically given as the probability of a neuron generating an action potential, or spike, in response to a stimulus . The goal of maximally informative dimensions is to find a small relevant subspace of the much larger stimulus space that accurately captures the salient features of . Let denote the dimensionality of the entire stimulus space and denote the dimensionality of the relevant subspace, such that . We let denote the basis of the relevant subspace, and the projection of onto . Using Bayes' theorem we can write out the probability of a spike given a stimulus:
where
is some nonlinear function of the projected stimulus.
In order to choose the optimal , we compare the prior stimulus distribution with the spike-triggered stimulus distribution using the Shannon information. The average information (averaged across all presented stimuli) per spike is given by
- .
Now consider a dimensional subspace defined by a single direction . The average information conveyed by a single spike about the projection is
- ,
where the probability distributions are approximated by a measured data set via and , i.e., each presented stimulus is represented by a scaled Dirac delta function and the probability distributions are created by averaging over all spike-eliciting stimuli, in the former case, or the entire presented stimulus set, in the latter case. For a given dataset, the average information is a function only of the direction . Under this formulation, the relevant subspace of dimension would be defined by the direction that maximizes the average information .
This procedure can readily be extended to a relevant subspace of dimension by defining
and
and maximizing .
Sign in to keep reading
One more chapter is free with a Lably account.
Importance
Maximally informative dimensions does not make any assumptions about the Gaussianity of the stimulus set, which is important, because naturalistic stimuli tend to have non-Gaussian statistics. In this way the technique is more robust than other dimensionality reduction techniques such as spike-triggered covariance analyses.

