Lably
Skip to content

Proclamation No. 1081

1972 declaration of martial law by Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos

  • 11 min read
  • 8 chapters

Related on Lably

Through De facto and de jure, China and Head of state

The proclamation marked the onset of a 14-year period of authoritarian rule, which would include eight years of Martial Law (de jure ending on January 17, 1981, through Proclamation No. 2045), but not de facto: followed by five more years where Marcos retained essentially all of his powers as dictator.

Marcos was eventually ousted on February 25, 1986, as a result of the EDSA People Power Revolution.

Reasons

Numerous explanations have been put forward as reasons for Marcos to declare martial law in September 1972, some of which were presented by the Marcos administration as official justifications, and some of which were dissenting perspectives put forward by either the mainstream political opposition or by analysts studying the political economy of the decision.

Official justifications

In his 1987 treatise, "Dictatorship & Martial Law: Philippine Authoritarianism in 1972", University of the Philippines Public Administration Professor Alex Brillantes Jr. identifies three reasons expressed by the Marcos administration, saying that martial law:

  1. was a response to various leftist and rightist plots against the Marcos administration;
  2. was just the consequence of political decay after American-style democracy failed to take root in Philippine society; and
  3. was a reflection of Filipino society's history of authoritarianism and supposed need for iron-fisted leadership.

The first two justifications were explicitly stated in the proclamation, which cited two explicit justifications: "to save the republic" (from various plots); and "to reform society" (after the failure of American-style democracy). The third rationalization arose from the administration's propaganda, which portrayed Ferdinand Marcos as a hypermasculine figure able to compel the obedience of supposedly "spoiled" Filipinos.

Incidents cited

Dissenting perspectives

Dissenting perspectives from the political mainstream

Opposition to Marcos' declaration of martial law ran the whole gamut of Philippine society - ranging from impoverished peasants whom the administration tried to chase out of their homes; to the Philippines' political old-guard, whom Marcos had tried to displace from power; to academics and economists who disagreed with the specifics of Marcos' martial law policies. All of these, regardless of their social position or policy beliefs, subscribed to the interpretation that Marcos declared martial law:

  1. as a strategy to enable Ferdinand Marcos to stay in power past the two Presidential terms allowed for him under Philippine Constitution of 1935
  2. as a technique for covering up the already amassed, and would-be still amassed, ill-gotten wealth of Marcos, his family, and his cronies.

Dissenting economic interpretations

In addition, some critics ascribe an economic component to Marcos' motivations, suggesting that martial law:

  1. was an acquiescence to the global market system, which required tight control of sociopolitical systems so that the country's resources could be exploited efficiently;
  2. was a product of the infighting among the families that formed the upper socioeconomic class of Philippine society; and
  3. was a connivance between the state powers and the upper-class families to keep the members of the country's lower classes from becoming too powerful.

Sign in to keep reading

7 more chapters are free with a Lably account.

More in Contemporary